Arizona renewable energy advocates gain against business slate

Clean energy advocates won an 8-to-6 majority on SRP's 14-member board while business-backed candidates retained president and vice president positions.

Objective Facts

Renewable energy advocates in Arizona made gains against a business-backed slate in a fight over how the nation's largest public power utility will meet surging electricity demand in a data center hot spot. The clean energy slate picked up two seats on the 14-member utility board, giving them an 8-to-6 majority in votes, but incumbents backed by construction firms and data center developers held on to the offices of president and vice president, keeping their agenda-setting power over what votes are presented to the board. The election, which wrapped up Tuesday, saw a surge of interest from voters amid rising household electricity prices and pushback against massive data centers in the battleground state. The utility projects that it needs to double its power capacity within a decade and has been under pressure to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. Vianey Olivarría with Chispa Arizona PAC stated clean energy voters turned out in force to demand accountability and lower energy bills from SRP.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Clean energy advocates and environmental groups including the Sierra Club celebrated the election outcome as a major victory despite restrictive voting rules, with unprecedented turnout signaling ratepayers' strong demand for clean energy solutions and an 8-6 majority positioning the board to support more affordable, long-term clean energy solutions. Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter Director Sandy Bahr stated that SRP continues to invest heavily in fossil gas operations going against the interests of its customers, and that the election is a wake up call: communities want a voice and they want to see more clean renewable energy in SRP's plans. Vianey Olivarría with Chispa Arizona PAC said clean energy voters turned out in force to demand accountability and lower energy bills, but argued the only reason they did not see a clean energy sweep is because of SRP's archaic acreage-based process which allows wealthy land owners to drown out the voices of everyday customers. Progressive groups want to make sure data center companies pay their fair share, and clean energy advocates believe SRP can meet peak demand with renewables and want to build more batteries that can store solar energy for nighttime use and invest in other carbon-free baseload power such as nuclear reactors, while also reducing demand stress by installing rooftop solar panels and making homes more energy-efficient. Clean Energy campaign manager Josie Mitz said solar and wind are some of the cheapest energy sources right now and investing in them will give families more control over their bills. Left-leaning coverage emphasizes Turning Point's heavy financial involvement and the archaic voting system as obstacles to clean energy adoption, downplaying the fact that SRP has two governing bodies with elected boards, and the business-backed side still holds the majority on the association board that oversees water delivery, and that business-backed candidates retained leadership positions limiting the clean energy majority's full control.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Turning Point Action, the Phoenix-based conservative activist organization, deployed hundreds and hundreds of full-time staff and substantial financial resources, with COO Tyler Bowyer stating the SRP election stops radical policies and really bad ideas that stem from progressivism. Turning Point USA got involved in the race, with supporters saying they wanted to keep the controversial Green New Deal out of Arizona and avoid a rapid shift to renewable energy. Chris Dobson, the winner of the presidency, stated he has voted for a diverse energy mix including solar, wind and nuclear energy, and that renewables are going to play a big part but you need natural gas for dispatchability and reliability because the other side doesn't want any natural gas but you need it to make the grid sustainable. The conservative slate supports SRP's current plan to convert retiring coal units into gas-fired power plants and to build new gas turbines across the service territory, arguing this is necessary for reliability. Barry Paceley said they're chasing rainbows and unicorns and questioned where power would come from in the real world with continued business growth and data centers. Turning Point Action COO Tyler Bowyer argued the radicals only won in deep blue areas and that they don't have total control of SRP since the business-backed candidates retained the presidency and vice presidency. Right-leaning coverage and commentary emphasize that Dobson and Paceley retained leadership positions that control what votes are presented to the board, and that the business side performed well in heavily Democratic areas. Coverage downplays the structural significance of the 8-6 voting majority, instead highlighting that the conservation of natural gas capacity remains possible through leadership discretion over agenda-setting.

Deep Dive

SRP now serves one of the nation's largest metro areas and generates power for more than 2 million customers in the Phoenix area, making it the largest public power utility in the country, yet still uses an acreage-based voting system where a person holding 20 acres gets 20 votes, a person owning a half-acre gets half a vote, many condo owners get .01 votes, and renters cannot vote at all, excluding thousands of ratepayers from voting. The election saw a surge of interest from voters amid rising household electricity prices and pushback against massive data centers in the battleground state, with national politics giving a jolt to once-low-profile elections for control over utilities. The outcome represents a genuine shift in voting power without absolute control. Clean energy candidates picked up two seats on the 14-member utility board giving them an 8-to-6 majority in votes that come before the board, but incumbents backed by construction firms and data center developers held on to the offices of president and vice president, keeping their agenda-setting power over what votes are presented to the board. This creates a scenario where the clean energy majority can block proposals (requiring 8 votes to pass) but cannot unilaterally set the agenda. Left-leaning analysts frame this as a historic shift toward renewables; right-leaning analysts emphasize continued leadership control. Both claims contain truth. Clean energy slate members have voted in the past against major natural gas projects being undertaken by the Salt River Project, as well as a rate increase last year, demonstrating their willingness to block incumbent priorities. Conversely, incumbents keeping the presidency and vice presidency preserve their ability to decide what votes even come before the board, a power Randy Miller acknowledged they would have to negotiate around. What comes next depends on whether the utility's need to double its power capacity within a decade forces compromise or deadlock. Clean energy advocates believe SRP can meet peak demand with renewables and want to build more batteries that can store solar energy for nighttime use and invest in other carbon-free baseload power such as nuclear reactors, while the conservative slate supports SRP's current plan to convert retiring coal units into gas-fired power plants and to build new gas turbines across the service territory. The board's actual power mix decisions in 2026-2030 will reveal whether the clean energy majority can use blocking power to force renewable-heavy strategies or whether the retained leadership effectively grinds policy toward traditional natural gas capacity.

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisAll StoriesUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyCommunity PicksAbout

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

Arizona renewable energy advocates gain against business slate

Clean energy advocates won an 8-to-6 majority on SRP's 14-member board while business-backed candidates retained president and vice president positions.

Apr 9, 2026· Updated Apr 12, 2026
What's Going On

Renewable energy advocates in Arizona made gains against a business-backed slate in a fight over how the nation's largest public power utility will meet surging electricity demand in a data center hot spot. The clean energy slate picked up two seats on the 14-member utility board, giving them an 8-to-6 majority in votes, but incumbents backed by construction firms and data center developers held on to the offices of president and vice president, keeping their agenda-setting power over what votes are presented to the board. The election, which wrapped up Tuesday, saw a surge of interest from voters amid rising household electricity prices and pushback against massive data centers in the battleground state. The utility projects that it needs to double its power capacity within a decade and has been under pressure to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. Vianey Olivarría with Chispa Arizona PAC stated clean energy voters turned out in force to demand accountability and lower energy bills from SRP.

Left says: Clean energy candidates secured a major victory despite heavy involvement from extremist anti-clean energy organizations and restrictive voting rules, with unprecedented turnout signaling ratepayers' strong demand for clean energy solutions.
Right says: Turning Point Action COO Tyler Bowyer argued mainstream media is trying to cope with the fact that environmentalists lost in the biggest turnout for one of the deepest blue territories in Arizona.
✓ Common Ground
Both clean energy advocates and business-backed candidates acknowledge the rival slates will be forced into compromises over potential questions of whether to increase rates and whether to favor natural gas or renewable energy technologies to meet power demand.
Both sides agree the utility needs to double its power capacity within a decade — clean energy advocates emphasize reducing fossil fuels while backers of incumbents warn of tight energy supplies and blackouts without relying on natural gas-fueled power plants.
Even Dobson, the business slate's successful presidential candidate, acknowledges renewables are going to play a big part and that the economics are clear and solar is cheap, suggesting some convergence on solar's role despite disagreements on natural gas capacity.
Both sides recognize the unprecedented nature of turnout in this election, with about 36,000 ballots cast compared to around 7,500 two years ago, indicating agreement that the 2026 election reflected exceptional voter engagement on energy policy.
Objective Deep Dive

SRP now serves one of the nation's largest metro areas and generates power for more than 2 million customers in the Phoenix area, making it the largest public power utility in the country, yet still uses an acreage-based voting system where a person holding 20 acres gets 20 votes, a person owning a half-acre gets half a vote, many condo owners get .01 votes, and renters cannot vote at all, excluding thousands of ratepayers from voting. The election saw a surge of interest from voters amid rising household electricity prices and pushback against massive data centers in the battleground state, with national politics giving a jolt to once-low-profile elections for control over utilities.

The outcome represents a genuine shift in voting power without absolute control. Clean energy candidates picked up two seats on the 14-member utility board giving them an 8-to-6 majority in votes that come before the board, but incumbents backed by construction firms and data center developers held on to the offices of president and vice president, keeping their agenda-setting power over what votes are presented to the board. This creates a scenario where the clean energy majority can block proposals (requiring 8 votes to pass) but cannot unilaterally set the agenda. Left-leaning analysts frame this as a historic shift toward renewables; right-leaning analysts emphasize continued leadership control. Both claims contain truth. Clean energy slate members have voted in the past against major natural gas projects being undertaken by the Salt River Project, as well as a rate increase last year, demonstrating their willingness to block incumbent priorities. Conversely, incumbents keeping the presidency and vice presidency preserve their ability to decide what votes even come before the board, a power Randy Miller acknowledged they would have to negotiate around.

What comes next depends on whether the utility's need to double its power capacity within a decade forces compromise or deadlock. Clean energy advocates believe SRP can meet peak demand with renewables and want to build more batteries that can store solar energy for nighttime use and invest in other carbon-free baseload power such as nuclear reactors, while the conservative slate supports SRP's current plan to convert retiring coal units into gas-fired power plants and to build new gas turbines across the service territory. The board's actual power mix decisions in 2026-2030 will reveal whether the clean energy majority can use blocking power to force renewable-heavy strategies or whether the retained leadership effectively grinds policy toward traditional natural gas capacity.

◈ Tone Comparison

Left-leaning outlets used language like major victory despite heavy involvement from extremist, anti-clean energy organizations, while right-leaning commentary from Turning Point argued mainstream media is trying to cope with the fact that the environmentalists lost in the biggest turnout for one of the deepest blue territories in Arizona. Both sides claim the outcome validates their position, with the left emphasizing voting majority and the right emphasizing leadership retention.