China's Xi Jinping launches new AI alliance amid global competition

Xi Jinping urged countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence and ensure no country dominates the technology, launching WAICO, formally formed on July 16, with 29 member founding countries including Indonesia, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, Senegal, Russia and Pakistan.

Objective Facts

Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday urged countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence and ensure no country dominates the technology – in an apparent jab at the United States. The World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organisation (WAICO) was formally formed on July 16, with 29 member founding countries including Indonesia, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, Senegal, Russia and Pakistan, headquartered in Shanghai. Xi announced that China will provide developing countries with 5,000 opportunities in AI training and seminar programs, as well as develop AI cooperation with various blocs, including the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the League of Arab States and the African Union. The new AI cooperation organization can be viewed as China's answer to the U.S.-led Pax Silica initiative, which focuses on strengthening collaboration with U.S. allies and partners on AI-related supply chains. Regional media in member states such as Kazakhstan, through its minister for AI and digital development, described WAICO's creation as moving the focus "from declarations to practical collaboration" and empowering nations to help craft international AI guidelines.

Left-Leaning Perspective

CNN's George Chen noted that "Xi sees AI as an opportunity to get more allies to compete with the US, not just in AI technology, but also in international relations – (this is) AI diplomacy," adding that China feels it missed the chance to set the rules on the global development of the world wide web over recent decades, but the arrival of AI finds it in a much stronger position. Governance expert Arindrajit Basu wrote in an analysis for the US think tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace that "With Washington rapidly retreating from global cyber and AI norms-setting processes and withdrawing its financial backing for cyber diplomacy more broadly, Beijing is keen to demonstrate its global leadership." War on the Rocks analysis notes that the co-evolution of AI governance standards and AI infrastructure has major effects on U.S. AI export competitiveness, and even as the United States maintains its lead in frontier AI capabilities, the rapid proliferation of lower-cost open-weight Chinese models poses security risks and risks entrenching Chinese standards.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Bloomberg reports that Xi used the rise of China's AI models to stake his claim on shaping the technology's global rules, even as their growing power stirs security alarms in Washington, with Chinese models' share of US firms' AI usage nearing record 60% on the popular marketplace OpenRouter. War on the Rocks analysis characterizes China's diplomats as on an "AI governance" offensive, emphasizing that China is exporting a full-stack AI ecosystem from standards to models, which provides an almost turnkey solution that may be particularly attractive to countries with weaker regulatory capacity or governments that may be less concerned about political values they view as being defined by liberal democracies. NaturalNews reporting notes that some nations, including India, remain skeptical of the people-centered pitch from China and Russia given their authoritarian governance, with India's former UN ambassador warning that WAICO could end up determining the "new global AI order."

Deep Dive

Rather than competing solely over semiconductor manufacturing or AI models, both powers are increasingly competing over who writes the rules governing the future digital economy. Xi Jinping's speech reflects a significant evolution in China's AI strategy, with Beijing no longer presenting itself simply as a technological challenger seeking to catch up with Silicon Valley but instead positioning itself as an architect of an alternative international technology order, mirroring China's broader foreign policy approach through the Belt and Road Initiative and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. WAICO's institutional design joins three features that no constituted multilateral body currently combines: membership open to any sovereign state, no values or regime-type test for entry, and an agenda built around development and the global capability divide. The incumbent Western-led bodies gate membership by shared values and concentrate on rights and safety; the universal United Nations bodies are open but anchored in human rights; a development-first agenda is otherwise carried by the regional strategies of the Global South. Cotton and other right-leaning voices argue that America's position in artificial intelligence will have sweeping implications for the country's economic strength, military capabilities, diplomatic influence and national security. How many further countries join WAICO — and whether any US allies break ranks to do so — will show whether Xi's pitch converts into durable influence over global AI rules. The upcoming U.S.-China AI dialogue will be closely watched not simply for signs of cooperation on AI safety, but for indications of whether the world's two largest economies can prevent technological competition from evolving into a fully fragmented global AI order.

Regional Perspective

Kazakhstan's minister for AI and digital development framed WAICO's creation as moving the focus "from declarations to practical collaboration" and emphasized that nations now vie for technology, talent, computing power, data, and the opportunity to influence international AI standards. Indonesia's government sent its coordinating minister for economic affairs to sign the agreement, with the delegation statement describing WAICO as a forum for governance, ethical standards, and collaborative AI development. Pakistan's foreign ministry formally declared its participation. Indian officials and analysts have cautioned that WAICO could shape the new global AI order and that democratic nations should remain vigilant about its governance implications. India remains skeptical of the people-centered pitch from China and Russia given their authoritarian governance. Regional media in non-member democracies such as Australia and Japan did not formally join, reflecting alignment with the U.S.-led Pax Silica framework instead. The opening ceremony featured keynote addresses by leaders from Kazakhstan, Cambodia and Thailand, with their collective voice laying bare what developing nations genuinely pursue in AI governance — a shared vision that the future of AI should be shaped through broader international participation, with developing countries able to access opportunities created by technological progress, framing AI governance ultimately as about ensuring innovation becomes a driver of development rather than geopolitical rivalry.

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisPolicy GuideAll StoriesCommunity PicksUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyAbout

China's Xi Jinping launches new AI alliance amid global competition

Xi Jinping urged countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence and ensure no country dominates the technology, launching WAICO, formally formed on July 16, with 29 member founding countries including Indonesia, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, Senegal, Russia and Pakistan.

Jul 17, 2026
What's Going On
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday urged countries to cooperate on artificial intelligence and ensure no country dominates the technology – in an apparent jab at the United States.
  • The inter-governmental organisation was formally formed on July 16, with stated goals to promote international cooperation and develop AI regulation across countries that ensure the technology is beneficial and safe for humans. WAICO's 29 member founding countries include several major Global South nations, including Indonesia, Brazil, Malaysia, South Africa, Senegal, Russia and Pakistan.
  • China has played a role in ensuring equitable access to AI capacity-building for developing countries to prevent the creation of "new historical injustices" and announced Beijing's plans to continue cooperating with countries across Africa, Latin America and Asia.
  • The new AI cooperation organization can be viewed as China's answer to the U.S.-led Pax Silica initiative, which focuses on strengthening collaboration with U.S. allies and partners on AI-related supply chains, with signatories including Japan, the U.K., Australia, the Philippines, Israel and India.
  • France has been among the most vocal in arguing that the body could normalize authoritarian AI governance models, with French officials describing it as an attempt to undermine the Hiroshima Process.
Far Left: The logic of capitalism and imperialism produces export controls, corporate enclosure and an arms race; the logic of socialism produces open source, capacity building and cooperation.
Left: The creation of WAICO signals that global competition over artificial intelligence is expanding beyond semiconductor technology and commercial innovation into the governance of the technology itself, with China increasingly investing in multilateral institutions that could influence how emerging markets regulate AI, manage data and adopt future tech standards.
Moderate: WAICO's proposed design joins three features that no constituted multilateral body currently combines: membership open to any sovereign state, no values or regime-type test for entry, and an agenda built around development and the global capability divide.
Right: Western critics have characterized WAICO's membership structure as deliberately designed to exclude Western democracies while giving China outsized influence over AI standards across the Global South.
Far Right: Some nations, including India, remain skeptical of the people-centered pitch from China and Russia given their authoritarian governance.
Region: Member states from Central Asia and Southeast Asia frame WAICO as a shift toward practical collaboration on AI standards and governance, emphasizing that nations now compete for influence over international AI standards alongside technology and computing power. However, India and other democratic nations express vigilance about WAICO's governance implications.
✓ Common Ground
Both the United States and China highlighted the need for all parts of society to benefit from AI technology and both committed to making AI accessible, including across several non-tech-related industries, pointing to overlapping interests that could offer a path toward cooperation on AI safety, as both sides did in 2023 when signing the voluntary Bletchley Park Declaration around AI safety.
Voices across the spectrum acknowledge that the world is becoming divided not only because of competition in AI technology itself but because of the struggle over who will write the rules for the internet in the age of AI, with two initiatives symbolizing the emergence of two camps in global AI governance.
Multiple analysts agree that Xi's speech reinforced China's determination to shape the future of AI rather than follow standards set elsewhere, with the message being clear that China is not going to follow anyone on both AI technology and standards.
◆ All Sources (12)
Modern Diplomacy - Can China Lead a New Global AI Order and Challenge US Dominance?TechTimes - China Launches Rival AI Governance Bloc as WAIC 2026 Opens With 300 Product DebutsPYMNTS - 29 Nations Join China-Led World AI Cooperation OrganizationCNN - Analysis: As Trump accuses China of stealing voter data, Xi pitches Beijing as a responsible tech leaderABC News - China's Xi calls for more global efforts to guide AI, chides US for its curbs on tech sharingWar on the Rocks - China's AI Governance Offensive Threatens U.S. Tech LeadershipBloomberg - China's AI Ascendance Gives Xi a Stage and a Security DilemmaFortune - Xi offers AI olive branch to the world, calling for 'symphony of global cooperation'NaturalNews - China and Russia launch 29-nation AI alliance to rival western control of technologyAl Jazeera - China's Xi Jinping launches new AI alliance: What is it?CGTN - A new chapter in global AI governance: Cooperation beyond dividesFriends of Socialist China - Xi Jinping outlines China's vision for the future of artificial intelligence
Objective Deep Dive

Rather than competing solely over semiconductor manufacturing or AI models, both powers are increasingly competing over who writes the rules governing the future digital economy. Xi Jinping's speech reflects a significant evolution in China's AI strategy, with Beijing no longer presenting itself simply as a technological challenger seeking to catch up with Silicon Valley but instead positioning itself as an architect of an alternative international technology order, mirroring China's broader foreign policy approach through the Belt and Road Initiative and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

WAICO's institutional design joins three features that no constituted multilateral body currently combines: membership open to any sovereign state, no values or regime-type test for entry, and an agenda built around development and the global capability divide. The incumbent Western-led bodies gate membership by shared values and concentrate on rights and safety; the universal United Nations bodies are open but anchored in human rights; a development-first agenda is otherwise carried by the regional strategies of the Global South. Cotton and other right-leaning voices argue that America's position in artificial intelligence will have sweeping implications for the country's economic strength, military capabilities, diplomatic influence and national security.

How many further countries join WAICO — and whether any US allies break ranks to do so — will show whether Xi's pitch converts into durable influence over global AI rules. The upcoming U.S.-China AI dialogue will be closely watched not simply for signs of cooperation on AI safety, but for indications of whether the world's two largest economies can prevent technological competition from evolving into a fully fragmented global AI order.

◈ Tone Comparison

While Xi avoided naming America directly for diplomatic reasons, emphasizing that AI development should not be "a solo performance by one country," the contrast with the Trump administration's AI Action Plan is stark, with Beijing stressing inclusivity and multilateralism whereas Washington's approach remains rooted in "America First." Left outlets emphasize geopolitical realignment and governance gaps; right-leaning outlets emphasize security threats and authoritarian governance risks.