DHS Longest Shutdown in U.S. History Nears 45 Days Without Resolution

House Republicans reject Senate's partial DHS funding deal, pass full-funding bill that Democrats say is 'dead on arrival,' ensuring shutdown extends past 44 days—the longest ever.

Objective Facts

The DHS shutdown hit a record 44th day on Sunday, March 29, becoming the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history. Early Friday morning, the Senate approved a bipartisan funding measure by voice vote to reopen DHS operations, but excluded funding for immigration enforcement activities, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Border Patrol. In a 213-203 vote Friday night, Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans voted to fund DHS for eight weeks – including border and immigration money that the prior deal left out. Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed that the House bill would be 'dead on arrival' in the Senate, meaning Democrats will not provide enough support to reach a 60-vote threshold. The Senate is scheduled to be out of town until April 13, and the House is set to be out until April 14.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Democrats rallied behind the Senate agreement, arguing it protects key agencies while blocking expanded immigration enforcement funding, with Rep. Maxine Dexter of Oregon calling it a win because "Democrats have successfully stopped any new funding for ICE and CBP while funding the rest of the Department of Homeland Security, including TSA." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said "In the wake of the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Senate Democrats were clear. No blank check for a lawless ICE and Border Patrol," and that the deal "strengthens security at the border and the ports of entry, and keeps Americans safe." Schumer said "Throughout it all, Senate Democrats stood united — no wavering, no backing down" and "no blank check for a lawless ICE and Border Patrol." The deal follows arduous bipartisan negotiations over the last six weeks around policy changes to immigration enforcement, with Democrats getting their weeks-long demand to fund the department with exceptions for ICE or CBP, but without the restrictions they sought on how immigration officers may conduct operations. After Trump's announcement to pay TSA workers, Democratic lawmakers criticized the President for the delayed response, with Rep. Brad Schneider posting "The President could have done this on day one." Democrats say the framework does not include other demands, like requiring judicial warrants for immigration agents to enter homes and businesses and a ban on face coverings for agents. House Democratic leaders said the bipartisan bill had the support of members of their party and it could have passed the House and ended the shutdown had there been a vote. House Democrats said they would not approve funding for immigration enforcement without a number of reforms, which Republicans have repeatedly rejected. Democrats frame the Senate bill as the best achievable outcome after a drawn-out negotiation, casting Republicans as unwilling to compromise on border accountability.

Right-Leaning Perspective

House GOP leaders, stunned by the Senate's move, simply refused to pass it, with Speaker Johnson saying "This gambit that was done last night is a joke," though he blamed Senate Democrats rather than Thune. The conservative House Freedom Caucus opposed the Senate bill, with Chair Andy Harris saying they couldn't believe the Senate didn't fund ICE's child sex-trafficking investigation division and border patrol, and the group wanted ICE and border patrol funding added back plus voter ID provisions. President Trump publicly voiced frustration with the Senate-passed bill, saying "you can't have a bill that's not going to fund ICE" and "can't have a bill that's not going to fund any form of law enforcement." Senate Majority Leader John Thune lambasted Democrats on the floor for what he framed as their refusal to negotiate in good faith, saying "We could be standing here right now passing a funding bill with a list of reforms if the Democrats had made the smallest effort to actually reach an agreement. But they didn't, because it's now clear to everyone, Democrats didn't actually want a solution, they wanted an issue, politics over policy, self-interest over reform, pandering to their base over actually solving a problem." Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins said Democrats "remained intransigent and unreasonable" in their DHS funding demands and that "Congressional Democrats have done real damage to the appropriations process by repeatedly forcing government shutdowns and refusing to fund entire agencies." Conservative Republicans were adamant against establishing a precedent that allows Congress during the yearly appropriations process to fund some agencies within Homeland Security but not others. Thune argued that Democrats had lost the opportunity to leverage changes to ICE protocols and tactics by refusing to fund ICE. Senate Republicans noted that immigration enforcement has remained largely uninterrupted because the GOP's tax cuts bill funneled billions of dollars in extra funds to DHS, including $75 billion for ICE operations. Republicans argue Democrats are using the shutdown politically and that preventing any new ICE funding while the agency still operates is incoherent negotiating.

Deep Dive

The shutdown originated after the killing of Alex Pretti by Customs and Border Protection agents on January 24, 2026, which led Senate Democrats to withdraw support for the DHS bill and block multiple Republican proposals. On March 26, Senate Democrats and Republicans reached an agreement to fund DHS except for immigration enforcement and deportation operations, with the new agreement not including major changes from the original January agreement. Trump said he may declare a national emergency to provide pay to TSA personnel, who have been working without pay since the shutdown began February 14. The core substantive disagreement is whether ICE requires operational reforms before receiving funding. Democrats argue that after the January shootings by CBP and ICE agents, legislative guardrails are necessary to prevent future violence—such as judicial warrant requirements and restrictions on tactical gear like masks. Republicans counter that ICE is continuing to operate effectively under the One Big Beautiful Bill's $75 billion allocation, so demanding reforms while withholding funding is both incoherent and a bad-faith political move. Both sides have legitimate points: Democrats note that operational funds give agencies discretion about practices, while Republicans accurately observe that ICE isn't actually defunded. What each side omits: Democrats rarely acknowledge that ICE's alternative funding source removes their leverage, while Republicans downplay that the January killings were controversial enough to justify Democratic demands for accountability before approving new appropriations. With Congress at a stalemate and both chambers departing Washington for the Easter and Passover holidays, lawmakers are not set to return until the week of April 13, meaning the shutdown will drag on for at least a couple more weeks while tens of thousands of DHS employees continue working without pay. The critical question ahead is whether Trump will pressure House Republicans to compromise on the Senate bill or whether House conservatives will hold firm and force a prolonged impasse. Senate Republican leadership has signaled they lack a path forward without Democratic support, but House conservatives appear willing to own the shutdown if it prevents a precedent of partial DHS funding. Trump's ability or willingness to broker an intra-Republican deal will likely determine the timeline for resolution.

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

DHS Longest Shutdown in U.S. History Nears 45 Days Without Resolution

House Republicans reject Senate's partial DHS funding deal, pass full-funding bill that Democrats say is 'dead on arrival,' ensuring shutdown extends past 44 days—the longest ever.

Mar 28, 2026· Updated Mar 30, 2026
What's Going On

The DHS shutdown hit a record 44th day on Sunday, March 29, becoming the longest partial government shutdown in U.S. history. Early Friday morning, the Senate approved a bipartisan funding measure by voice vote to reopen DHS operations, but excluded funding for immigration enforcement activities, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Border Patrol. In a 213-203 vote Friday night, Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans voted to fund DHS for eight weeks – including border and immigration money that the prior deal left out. Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed that the House bill would be 'dead on arrival' in the Senate, meaning Democrats will not provide enough support to reach a 60-vote threshold. The Senate is scheduled to be out of town until April 13, and the House is set to be out until April 14.

Left says: Senate Democrats maintain they won't approve more funding for ICE without reforms, and say a bipartisan Senate bill that House Democrats are prepared to support could pass if brought to the floor. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the House Republican approach "extreme right-wing ideology" that Republicans are trying to "jam down the throats of the American people" to "continue to spend billions of dollars for ICE."
Right says: House Speaker Mike Johnson said he told Senate Majority Leader Thune "we're not going to split apart two of the most important agencies in the government and leave them hanging like that." President Trump said "you can't have a bill that's not going to fund ICE" and "can't have a bill that's not going to fund any form of law enforcement."
✓ Common Ground
Both sides acknowledge that ICE and parts of CBP continue to receive funds due to an influx of cash provided in the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill passed by Congress last summer.
Both Republicans and Democrats agree that Senate Democrats did not secure most of the reforms to federal immigration enforcement they demanded after federal officers fatally shot two Americans in Minnesota.
Both sides acknowledge that the shutdown is affecting travelers across the U.S. with TSA staffing shortages, unpaid officers working without compensation, and leading to hundreds quitting and thousands calling out of work.
Some moderate Democrats and Senate Republicans appear to share frustration that negotiations have dragged on without progress. President Trump has signaled willingness to declare a national emergency to provide pay to TSA personnel, suggesting Trump and some Republicans recognize the unsustainability of the current path.
Objective Deep Dive

The shutdown originated after the killing of Alex Pretti by Customs and Border Protection agents on January 24, 2026, which led Senate Democrats to withdraw support for the DHS bill and block multiple Republican proposals. On March 26, Senate Democrats and Republicans reached an agreement to fund DHS except for immigration enforcement and deportation operations, with the new agreement not including major changes from the original January agreement. Trump said he may declare a national emergency to provide pay to TSA personnel, who have been working without pay since the shutdown began February 14.

The core substantive disagreement is whether ICE requires operational reforms before receiving funding. Democrats argue that after the January shootings by CBP and ICE agents, legislative guardrails are necessary to prevent future violence—such as judicial warrant requirements and restrictions on tactical gear like masks. Republicans counter that ICE is continuing to operate effectively under the One Big Beautiful Bill's $75 billion allocation, so demanding reforms while withholding funding is both incoherent and a bad-faith political move. Both sides have legitimate points: Democrats note that operational funds give agencies discretion about practices, while Republicans accurately observe that ICE isn't actually defunded. What each side omits: Democrats rarely acknowledge that ICE's alternative funding source removes their leverage, while Republicans downplay that the January killings were controversial enough to justify Democratic demands for accountability before approving new appropriations.

With Congress at a stalemate and both chambers departing Washington for the Easter and Passover holidays, lawmakers are not set to return until the week of April 13, meaning the shutdown will drag on for at least a couple more weeks while tens of thousands of DHS employees continue working without pay. The critical question ahead is whether Trump will pressure House Republicans to compromise on the Senate bill or whether House conservatives will hold firm and force a prolonged impasse. Senate Republican leadership has signaled they lack a path forward without Democratic support, but House conservatives appear willing to own the shutdown if it prevents a precedent of partial DHS funding. Trump's ability or willingness to broker an intra-Republican deal will likely determine the timeline for resolution.

◈ Tone Comparison

Republicans use accusatory language framing Democrats as unserious negotiators pursuing "politics over policy," while Democrats employ moral language portraying ICE as a "rogue and deadly militia" requiring accountability before funding. Republicans emphasize national security and government responsibility, while Democrats emphasize accountability and preventing harm to communities.

✕ Key Disagreements
Whether to fund ICE and CBP without immigration enforcement reforms
Left: Democrats have consistently vowed to block funding for ICE and CBP without constraints on immigration enforcement operations, maintaining they won't approve more funding without reforms.
Right: Republicans said they would not agree to adding new reforms for immigration enforcement operations if Democrats won't agree to fully fund ICE, with Thune saying "A lot of the reforms were contingent on funding for ICE."
Whether splitting DHS funding (funding some agencies but not ICE/CBP) is acceptable
Left: The Senate passed a bill that funds most of DHS while carving out ICE and CBP funding, which House Democrats say has their support and could pass the House with a vote.
Right: Conservative Republicans are adamant against establishing a precedent that allows Congress to fund some agencies within Homeland Security but not others, viewing this as dangerous to the appropriations process.
Whether Democrats are negotiating in good faith
Left: Democrats say the Republican framework does not include other demands like judicial warrants for immigration agents and a ban on face coverings, with Schumer saying "Republicans sent us their offer yesterday, and it contained nothing that had been talked about."
Right: Senate Majority Leader Thune argued Democrats lost the opportunity to leverage changes to ICE protocols and said "Democrats didn't actually want a solution. They wanted an issue. Politics over policy, self-interest over reform, pandering to their base."
The urgency and responsibility for ending the shutdown
Left: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said "The only thing standing between ending this chaos, or not, are House Republicans."
Right: Senate Majority Leader John Thune said "Since Democrats have made fiscal year 2026 the year they choose to repudiate one of their most basic responsibilities as members of Congress, to fund the government, this is what we have been reduced to."