El Salvador Deportees Forcibly Disappeared Says Human Rights Watch

Objective Facts

Human Rights Watch reported on March 16 that El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, one year after some of the men were sent to El Salvador. HRW interviewed 20 relatives and lawyers of 11 Salvadorans who were deported from the United States between mid-March and mid-October 2025 and then immediately detained in El Salvador. Like most detainees in El Salvador, these men have not been allowed to communicate with their relatives or lawyers. None of the relatives or lawyers have had any indication from the authorities that the men have been brought before a judge since their arrival. The detained people are among more than 9,000 Salvadorans deported by the United States since the start of 2025.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Common Dreams and progressive outlets report that the Salvadoran government is arbitrarily detaining and forcibly disappearing Salvadorans deported from the United States, while the Trump administration has alleged that many of those expelled are members of MS-13 without providing much evidence to substantiate claims regarding many of the deportees. They highlight that at least one deported Salvadoran—longtime Maryland resident Kilmar Ábrego García—was wrongfully expelled due to what the Trump administration called an "administrative error," and Abrego García said he was tortured at CECOT before a US federal judge ordered his release last December. Left-leaning sources emphasize that some of those deported had fled violence in El Salvador before migrating to the United States, including threats and extortion linked to gangs, and Ábrego's lawyers told U.S. courts that he had been physically abused while detained in Salvadoran prisons. Only 10.5% of the more than 9,000 people deported from the U.S. to El Salvador since January 2025 were convicted in the U.S. of a violent or potentially violent crime, according to HRW. The detentions are occurring amid El Salvador's nationwide state of emergency, which has been in effect since March 2022, with emergency powers that have suspended several procedural protections, including the right to be informed promptly of the reason for arrest, the right to remain silent, access to legal counsel and the requirement that detainees be brought before a judge within 72 hours. Left outlets use this context to argue the Trump administration knowingly sent deportees to a system devoid of due process.

Right-Leaning Perspective

No substantive right-leaning coverage of the specific March 2026 Human Rights Watch report was found in available search results. The Trump administration and conservative outlets have not issued public statements directly responding to this particular report's allegations. Historically, the Trump administration has defended the deportation program by emphasizing gang threats. In 2025, Trump stated "As President of the United States and Commander in Chief, it is my solemn duty to protect the American people from the devastating effects of this invasion," and Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted "We have sent 2 dangerous top MS-13 leaders plus 21 of its most wanted back to face justice in El Salvador," and "we sent over 250 alien enemy members of Tren de Aragua which El Salvador has agreed to hold in their very good jails at a fair price." Conservative groups including the Heritage Foundation have formed a Mass Deportation Coalition calling last year's focus on removing violent criminal immigrants "phase one" and saying "phase two" should focus on deporting immigrants beyond those with violent criminal histories. However, no right-leaning outlet or administration official has publicly addressed HRW's specific findings about lack of due process, incommunicado detention, or torture allegations in response to this March 2026 report.

Deep Dive

The Human Rights Watch report released March 16, 2026, documents that El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, with more than 9,000 Salvadorans deported since the start of 2025, some deported on March 15, 2025, alongside Venezuelans who were tortured and, in some cases, sexually abused in the Center for Terrorism Confinement (CECOT) mega prison. El Salvador's nationwide state of emergency has been in effect since March 2022, with emergency powers suspending several procedural protections, including the right to be informed promptly of the reason for arrest, the right to remain silent, access to legal counsel and the requirement that detainees be brought before a judge within 72 hours. This context—a U.S. deportation program meeting an El Salvadoran regime using emergency powers—created conditions for the reported abuses. The data reveals fundamental disagreements about risk and evidence. HRW found that only 10.5 percent of deported Salvadorans had U.S. convictions for violent crimes, contradicting the Trump administration's implicit characterization of deportees as dangerous criminals. Yet the administration did successfully identify at least one high-profile gang leader, César Humberto López Larios." ICE admitted that "many" deportees had no criminal record in the United States but alleged gang ties were robust—though evidence was based on subjective interpretation of tattoos and social media posts, a troubling process given that experts argue gangs like Tren de Aragua do not even use tattoos or hand signs as identifying marks. The left's argument has factual grounding: the evidentiary bar for gang membership appears far lower than for criminal convictions. El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, and like most detainees in El Salvador, these men have not been allowed to communicate with their relatives or lawyers, with none of the relatives or lawyers having any indication from the authorities that the men have been brought before a judge since their arrival, and some not being informed of where their loved ones are held, or why. The Trump administration has not publicly disputed these factual claims, with El Salvador's Presidential Office not responding to requests for comment on the report. What remains unresolved is whether the Trump administration bears responsibility for conditions it had to anticipate when sending deportees to a country operating under emergency rule, and whether invoking the Alien Enemies Act legitimately bypassed due process or violated constitutional protections. Courts are still litigating this question. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the administration's pretext for invoking the Act, finding that the United States was not under any sort of invasion, and the case is being reviewed by the full Fifth Circuit and may go before the Supreme Court. The next development to watch is whether courts ultimately bar further use of this wartime statute for immigration enforcement.

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

El Salvador Deportees Forcibly Disappeared Says Human Rights Watch

Mar 16, 2026· Updated Mar 18, 2026
What's Going On

Human Rights Watch reported on March 16 that El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, one year after some of the men were sent to El Salvador. HRW interviewed 20 relatives and lawyers of 11 Salvadorans who were deported from the United States between mid-March and mid-October 2025 and then immediately detained in El Salvador. Like most detainees in El Salvador, these men have not been allowed to communicate with their relatives or lawyers. None of the relatives or lawyers have had any indication from the authorities that the men have been brought before a judge since their arrival. The detained people are among more than 9,000 Salvadorans deported by the United States since the start of 2025.

Left says: HRW Americas Director Juanita Goebertus stated "The United States should stop casting people into the black hole of El Salvador's prison system." Left-leaning outlets frame this as evidence that Trump's mass deportation agenda violates due process and subjects vulnerable people—including those who fled gang violence—to torture and arbitrary detention.
Right says: No significant right-leaning or Trump administration official response to the March 2026 HRW report was found in available sources. The Trump administration has justified deportations as targeting gang members and national security threats, but has not publicly addressed the specific allegations in this report.
✓ Common Ground
Both left and right acknowledge that the Trump administration has identified specific gang members among deportees, with one known MS-13 leader, César Humberto López Larios, being disclosed.
There appears to be shared recognition that one deportee, Kilmar Ábrego García, was deported on March 15, 2025, but the Trump administration later acknowledged the removal occurred due to what it described as an "administrative error."
Both sides acknowledge the existence of El Salvador's state of emergency and its implications for detention procedures, though they interpret its significance differently.
Objective Deep Dive

The Human Rights Watch report released March 16, 2026, documents that El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, with more than 9,000 Salvadorans deported since the start of 2025, some deported on March 15, 2025, alongside Venezuelans who were tortured and, in some cases, sexually abused in the Center for Terrorism Confinement (CECOT) mega prison. El Salvador's nationwide state of emergency has been in effect since March 2022, with emergency powers suspending several procedural protections, including the right to be informed promptly of the reason for arrest, the right to remain silent, access to legal counsel and the requirement that detainees be brought before a judge within 72 hours. This context—a U.S. deportation program meeting an El Salvadoran regime using emergency powers—created conditions for the reported abuses.

The data reveals fundamental disagreements about risk and evidence. HRW found that only 10.5 percent of deported Salvadorans had U.S. convictions for violent crimes, contradicting the Trump administration's implicit characterization of deportees as dangerous criminals. Yet the administration did successfully identify at least one high-profile gang leader, César Humberto López Larios." ICE admitted that "many" deportees had no criminal record in the United States but alleged gang ties were robust—though evidence was based on subjective interpretation of tattoos and social media posts, a troubling process given that experts argue gangs like Tren de Aragua do not even use tattoos or hand signs as identifying marks. The left's argument has factual grounding: the evidentiary bar for gang membership appears far lower than for criminal convictions.

El Salvador is forcibly disappearing and arbitrarily detaining Salvadorans deported from the United States, and like most detainees in El Salvador, these men have not been allowed to communicate with their relatives or lawyers, with none of the relatives or lawyers having any indication from the authorities that the men have been brought before a judge since their arrival, and some not being informed of where their loved ones are held, or why. The Trump administration has not publicly disputed these factual claims, with El Salvador's Presidential Office not responding to requests for comment on the report. What remains unresolved is whether the Trump administration bears responsibility for conditions it had to anticipate when sending deportees to a country operating under emergency rule, and whether invoking the Alien Enemies Act legitimately bypassed due process or violated constitutional protections. Courts are still litigating this question. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the administration's pretext for invoking the Act, finding that the United States was not under any sort of invasion, and the case is being reviewed by the full Fifth Circuit and may go before the Supreme Court. The next development to watch is whether courts ultimately bar further use of this wartime statute for immigration enforcement.

◈ Tone Comparison

Left-leaning outlets employ urgent, dramatic language emphasizing human rights violations—"disappearance," "torture," "black hole." The Trump administration's historical statements use security-focused language like "dangerous criminals," "terrorist," and "invasion," framing enforcement as protective rather than punitive. The key tonal difference is whether actions are portrayed as rights violations or national security measures.

✕ Key Disagreements
Scope and nature of gang membership among deportees
Left: HRW analysis indicates that only 10.5 percent of the at least 9,000 Salvadorans deported to El Salvador since January 2025 had a conviction in the United States for a violent or potentially violent crime. Left argues the administration exaggerates gang ties to justify mass deportations.
Right: The Trump administration argues that many deportees are gang members posing national security threats and that gang membership cannot always be proven through U.S. convictions alone, citing intelligence and other evidence.
Whether deportations violate due process rights
Left: HRW states "Whatever the criminal history of these Salvadoran men, they have a right to due process, to be taken before a judge, and their relatives are entitled to know where they are being held and why."
Right: The Trump administration has invoked the Alien Enemies Act as legal authority for expedited deportations, arguing this wartime authority supersedes normal due process requirements for national security threats.
Responsibility for conditions in Salvadoran prisons
Left: HRW argues "The United States should stop casting people into the black hole of El Salvador's prison system," implying U.S. responsibility for deportees' fates.
Right: The Trump administration would likely argue El Salvador bears primary responsibility for prison conditions, while the U.S. is simply enforcing immigration law and deporting criminal aliens.
Evidentiary standards for gang allegations
Left: The Trump administration alleged that several of the Salvadorans are members of the MS-13 gang, but neither US nor Salvadoran authorities have provided evidence to substantiate claims regarding most deportees.
Right: The Trump administration contends it has robust intelligence evidence of gang ties, even if not presented in formal court proceedings prior to deportation.