HHS Plans 12,000 New Hires Despite Prior Mass Layoffs

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the House Appropriations Committee the department plans to hire 12,000 new staff, bringing headcount to 72,000 employees, one year after massive layoffs reduced the workforce to 62,000.

Objective Facts

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the House Appropriations Committee last week that the department now has 72,000 employees and plans to hire 12,000 new staff. Last year, HHS laid off 10,000 employees, and another 10,000 accepted early retirement or deferred resignation programs, reducing the agency from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Kennedy said the department was ineffective in meeting its goals before the workforce reductions, and told the subcommittee the department will have made up all lost employees, "replaced them with a better group of people who are actually going to address chronic health." HHS centralized reasonable accommodation requests as part of a new policy, with 9,000+ pending cases creating significant processing backlogs across the department.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Democrats lambasted Kennedy across three House hearings in April for controversial changes to vaccine policy, rising healthcare costs and upheaval at HHS, which has lost thousands of employees. Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) directly challenged Kennedy's characterization of the laid-off workers, asking "Your judgment is that the 20,000 [employees] that were reduced were not capable, were not motivated?" and stated that employees were "removed to get to a number, not to affect a result." Yolanda Jacobs, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 2883, which represents CDC headquarters employees, stated the hiring plan is "yet another example of this administration realizing way too late the consequences of unnecessarily terminating critically important federal workers" and argued they are "trying to swiftly close the gap and fill necessary positions they had previously terminated." During multiple hearings, Democrats argued the administration's healthcare policies and proposed cuts to HHS are contradictory to Kennedy's stated aims to improve Americans' health and lessen chronic disease. Democrats took the opportunity to grill Kennedy on the upsurge in vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles and questions about proposed cuts to his agency's budget. Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) noted that about 300 CDC employees working on tobacco prevention, maternal mortality and disabilities have been on paid administrative leave for more than a year, costing the agency about $38 million, and challenged Kennedy to bring them back from administrative leave "just as you brought back the CDC employees focused on occupational health." Left-leaning coverage emphasizes contradictions: more generous financial assistance for health plans on the Affordable Care Act exchanges expired at the end of 2025, causing premiums to skyrocket, while HHS operates with fewer employees after the massive reorganization cut thousands of jobs. Some GOP senators themselves have questioned how HHS could tackle chronic disease, smoking cessation, and cancer research with a proposed 12% budget cut, with lawmakers seeming poised to reject cuts to biomedical research and public health spending for a second straight year.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee praised Kennedy as a "breath of fresh air" and asked him to promote the department's recent actions, with Kennedy emphasizing the administration's work to reform dietary guidelines and crack down on waste, fraud and abuse. Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) praised Kennedy's anti-fraud work, noting he had already shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles that "were giving people in poor neighborhoods flat-screen televisions and they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice," contrasting this with the Biden administration's inaction. Although Republicans largely praised Kennedy's track record as secretary, commending the HHS' moves to change nutrition guidelines, restrict food dyes and crack down on fraud in government healthcare programs, some GOP lawmakers appeared concerned about the White House's HHS budget request for fiscal year 2027. Throughout Senate hearings, Republicans praised Kennedy for out-of-the-box thinking on areas like nutrition and prevention, with Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) calling Kennedy's effort to focus on "nutrition and prevention and healthy lifestyles" one of the most significant things he has done. House members on both sides brought up HHS efforts to save federal health dollars by reducing fraud, waste and abuse, with Republicans specifically praising Kennedy for pursuing Medicaid fraud in Democrat-led states of California and New York. Kennedy frequently touted the HHS' moves to rein in fraud and wasteful spending, a major priority for the Trump administration as a whole. Some GOP lawmakers did raise concerns about the White House's HHS budget request for fiscal year 2027, particularly regarding cuts to the NIH. Rep. Mike Simpson (ID), a dentist, was among the few Republicans to question the NIH budget cuts, worrying NIH will implement changes before Congress can review the plan, and Kennedy said he did not know what the budget request says about dental health but said he is committed to that research area.

Deep Dive

A year ago, HHS laid off 10,000 employees and another 10,000 accepted deferred resignation or early retirement offers, shrinking the department from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Kennedy justified the cuts by arguing HHS had grown by 38% during the Biden administration due to COVID, saying "we had, at the end, 10 people doing one job. We cut that down to five people doing the same job." Kennedy told lawmakers the cuts were necessary "to change the culture at these agencies" and said new hires are aligned with Trump administration priorities rather than representing admission of error. Democrats argue the administration's healthcare policies and proposed cuts contradict Kennedy's stated health goals, noting that more generous ACA subsidies expired at year-end 2025, causing premiums to skyrocket, while HHS operates with fewer employees after the reorganization. Federal employment law experts raise a substantive legal issue: when an agency conducts a RIF then quickly announces large-scale hiring in the same functional areas, it raises questions about whether those positions were ever truly abolished—a challenge that could undermine the RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board. HHS has already walked back many of the original 10,000 layoffs, most recently rescinding RIFs sent to around 400 employees at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Kennedy's simultaneous claim that there was no service degradation after the cuts but that 12,000 new hires are now necessary presents a logical tension that each side exploits differently. What remains unresolved is whether the hiring plan demonstrates operational lessons learned from necessary but painful restructuring (the administration's framing), or whether it proves the original cuts were errors carried out with insufficient planning (the opposition's framing). The pending legal challenges and continued hiring suggest this debate will extend beyond Congress into federal courts.

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisPolicy GuideAll StoriesCommunity PicksUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyAbout

HHS Plans 12,000 New Hires Despite Prior Mass Layoffs

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the House Appropriations Committee the department plans to hire 12,000 new staff, bringing headcount to 72,000 employees, one year after massive layoffs reduced the workforce to 62,000.

Apr 28, 2026· Updated May 2, 2026
What's Going On

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the House Appropriations Committee last week that the department now has 72,000 employees and plans to hire 12,000 new staff. Last year, HHS laid off 10,000 employees, and another 10,000 accepted early retirement or deferred resignation programs, reducing the agency from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Kennedy said the department was ineffective in meeting its goals before the workforce reductions, and told the subcommittee the department will have made up all lost employees, "replaced them with a better group of people who are actually going to address chronic health." HHS centralized reasonable accommodation requests as part of a new policy, with 9,000+ pending cases creating significant processing backlogs across the department.

Left says: Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) challenged Kennedy, saying employees laid off last year "were removed to get to a number, not to affect a result." Labor union officials contend the hiring plan is "another example" of the administration admitting to "consequences of unnecessarily terminating critically important federal workers."
Right says: Republicans praised Kennedy as a "breath of fresh air" for cracking down on waste, fraud and abuse in federal health programs. GOP lawmakers commended HHS' moves to change nutrition guidelines, restrict food dyes and crack down on fraud.
✓ Common Ground
Multiple voices across the aisle acknowledge that some positions cuts were made in error—Kennedy himself admitted to reporters that HHS estimated about 2,000, or 20%, of the recent job cuts were done in error.
Democratic and Republican budget writers seem poised to reject proposed cuts to NIH research and public health programs for the second year in a row, suggesting some bipartisan concern about the depth of departmental reductions.
Both political sides acknowledge the backlog of reasonable accommodations is a serious operational problem that needs fixing—the debate is over whether layoffs created the problem or merely exposed existing inefficiency.
Objective Deep Dive

A year ago, HHS laid off 10,000 employees and another 10,000 accepted deferred resignation or early retirement offers, shrinking the department from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Kennedy justified the cuts by arguing HHS had grown by 38% during the Biden administration due to COVID, saying "we had, at the end, 10 people doing one job. We cut that down to five people doing the same job." Kennedy told lawmakers the cuts were necessary "to change the culture at these agencies" and said new hires are aligned with Trump administration priorities rather than representing admission of error.

Democrats argue the administration's healthcare policies and proposed cuts contradict Kennedy's stated health goals, noting that more generous ACA subsidies expired at year-end 2025, causing premiums to skyrocket, while HHS operates with fewer employees after the reorganization. Federal employment law experts raise a substantive legal issue: when an agency conducts a RIF then quickly announces large-scale hiring in the same functional areas, it raises questions about whether those positions were ever truly abolished—a challenge that could undermine the RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board. HHS has already walked back many of the original 10,000 layoffs, most recently rescinding RIFs sent to around 400 employees at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Kennedy's simultaneous claim that there was no service degradation after the cuts but that 12,000 new hires are now necessary presents a logical tension that each side exploits differently. What remains unresolved is whether the hiring plan demonstrates operational lessons learned from necessary but painful restructuring (the administration's framing), or whether it proves the original cuts were errors carried out with insufficient planning (the opposition's framing). The pending legal challenges and continued hiring suggest this debate will extend beyond Congress into federal courts.

◈ Tone Comparison

Democratic commentary emphasizes contradiction and reversal—using words like "realizing way too late" and "consequences"—to frame the hiring as an admission of error. Republican framing emphasizes fraud-fighting and strategic efficiency, describing hiring as normal operational adjustment and using phrases like "breath of fresh air" to characterize Kennedy positively despite policy changes. The tone difference reflects fundamentally opposing interpretations of whether the layoffs were justified reorganization or harmful mismanagement.