ICE agents deployed to major U.S. airports during DHS shutdown to assist TSA

White House border czar Tom Homan said Monday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been deployed to 14 US airports to assist TSA agents amid a six-week DHS shutdown.

Objective Facts

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been deployed to 14 US airports to assist TSA agents, with Americans prepared to see more. TSA's more than 50,000 officers have been working without their regular paychecks since the partial government shutdown began in mid-February, and more than 400 TSA officers have left their jobs while thousands of others called out from work. Homan told CNN the ICE agents will be "helping TSA move those lines along," including by guarding exit doors to relieve TSA agents so they could screen travelers. The shutdown comes as Democrats in Congress demand changes to how federal immigration enforcement operates in exchange for releasing DHS funding after two U.S. citizens were shot and killed by officers in Minneapolis. Trump said he's asked that ICE officers not to wear masks at airports, even though he supports them wearing masks in their immigration enforcement duties.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Democratic outlets and leaders have framed the ICE deployment as a dangerous move that prioritizes politics over substantive solutions. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries blasted the plan, saying "the last thing that the American people need are for untrained ICE agents to be deployed at airports all across the country, potentially to brutalize or, in some instances, kill them." Senator Patty Murray was blunter, posting on X: "Oh yeah, I'm sure the next thing the American people want after long lines at TSA is to get wrongfully detained, beat up, and harassed by ICE." Democrats argue that ICE agents lack critical aviation security training that TSA officers spend months developing. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement that "ICE agents are not trained or certified in aviation security," noting that TSA officers spend months learning to detect explosives, weapons and threats, and deserve "to be paid, not replaced by untrained, armed agents who have shown how dangerous they can be." John Sandweg, a former acting ICE director under President Barack Obama, told CNN that while he trusts Homan to deploy ICE agents "as minimally intrusive as possible," TSA agents have unique skillsets and "unique training experiences" that even people with other law enforcement training would not be able to replicate, and that "ICE's contributions wouldn't be that operationally significant." The broader Democratic narrative emphasizes that the root cause—TSA agent paychecks—remains unresolved, making the deployment a distraction. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer urged Republicans to support Democratic funding efforts, saying "it is unacceptable for workers and travelers and entire airports to get taken hostage in political games," and that "it is unacceptable to say we will only pay TSA workers if it is attached to a bill that funds ICE with no reforms," while "Democrats want to pay TSA workers ASAP, with no strings attached." Democrats note that they have repeatedly attempted to pass standalone TSA funding bills, which Republicans have blocked.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Republican officials have defended the deployment as an immediate, pragmatic response to a crisis caused by Democratic obstruction on DHS funding. A DHS spokesperson stated that "President Trump is taking action to deploy hundreds of ICE officers, that are currently funded by Congress, to airports being adversely impacted" and that "this will help bolster TSA efforts to keep our skies safe and minimize air travel disruptions." Border czar Tom Homan told reporters "We're there to help the American people transit those lines that are taking hours, because the Democrats shut the government down." Republicans argue that ICE has relevant law enforcement capabilities that can be deployed quickly without extensive retraining. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said that ICE agents are trained and can assist with airport security, and that "sending in ICE takes away possible leverage for Democrats," arguing that "Democrats want to see long lines at airports as leverage" while "President Trump's trying to take that leverage away and not make the American people suffer." ICE received $75 billion in additional funds from the "big, beautiful bill," the president's major legislative package, while TSA and other DHS agencies remain unfunded. The Republican narrative frames Democrats as holding airport security hostage over immigration policy demands unrelated to TSA operations. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., described Democrats' demands as an effort akin to seeking to defund the police. Some Republicans have suggested willingness to split ICE/CBP funding from the rest of DHS, though the party has generally maintained that full DHS funding should not be conditional on immigration reform demands.

Deep Dive

This confrontation reveals a fundamental breakdown in how both parties frame emergency governance. The immediate crisis—TSA staff attrition causing security delays—is indisputable. What divides the parties is whether treating the symptom (staffing gaps via ICE) is acceptable without addressing the underlying political impasse over ICE reforms. The left's position rests on two pillars: (1) ICE agents objectively lack aviation security training that takes months to develop, and (2) deploying the very agency whose conduct triggered the shutdown signals bad faith negotiating and could demoralize TSA workers. The claim has empirical support—TSA training includes explosives detection, threat assessment, and recertification protocols distinct from general law enforcement. However, the left underestimates what ICE agents can accomplish in narrowly defined roles (crowd control, exit monitoring, ID checking) that don't require X-ray certification. The deeper Democratic critique—that this is a distraction from forcing payment—carries weight given that ICE deployment does nothing to resolve the shutdown or end nonpayment. Yet Democrats have also shown limited appetite for splitting off TSA funding without broader ICE concessions, so the tactical position is not purely about worker welfare. The right's position emphasizes available resources and unblocking immediate congestion. The fact that ICE has current appropriations while TSA does not is a genuine administrative reality. Homan's claim that ICE agents can handle exits/entrances without specialized training is reasonable for that narrow scope. However, Republicans overstate the magnitude of relief (former ICE Director Sandweg suggests the operational impact is minimal) and sidestep the optics problem: deploying the agency that killed two Americans to fix the airport crisis it helped cause is politically tone-deaf even if tactically sound. Republicans also conflate "Democrats blocking DHS" with "Democrats refusing full-scope funding without reform conditions"—two different claims. Democrats genuinely have offered standalone TSA funding; Republicans blocked it to preserve leverage on ICE. Both sides are negotiating, not one obstruction-free. What remains unresolved: whether ICE agents will actually perform any immigration enforcement at airports (Homan said "we do immigration enforcement at airports all the time"), whether the deployment will demoralize TSA workers further, and whether the moderate effectiveness (crowd help, not screening help) justifies the political cost. A reported arrest at San Francisco airport on March 23 suggests mission creep concerns are not theoretical. The next critical date is March 27, when another TSA paycheck cycle arrives; more resignations are likely if the shutdown persists. Both parties face electoral risk—Republicans from appearing to exploit TSA suffering for anti-immigrant positioning, Democrats from appearing to weaponize worker welfare for immigration policy leverage.

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

ICE agents deployed to major U.S. airports during DHS shutdown to assist TSA

White House border czar Tom Homan said Monday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been deployed to 14 US airports to assist TSA agents amid a six-week DHS shutdown.

Mar 23, 2026
What's Going On

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been deployed to 14 US airports to assist TSA agents, with Americans prepared to see more. TSA's more than 50,000 officers have been working without their regular paychecks since the partial government shutdown began in mid-February, and more than 400 TSA officers have left their jobs while thousands of others called out from work. Homan told CNN the ICE agents will be "helping TSA move those lines along," including by guarding exit doors to relieve TSA agents so they could screen travelers. The shutdown comes as Democrats in Congress demand changes to how federal immigration enforcement operates in exchange for releasing DHS funding after two U.S. citizens were shot and killed by officers in Minneapolis. Trump said he's asked that ICE officers not to wear masks at airports, even though he supports them wearing masks in their immigration enforcement duties.

Left says: Democrats argue that Republicans are forcing TSA agents to work without pay and exposing travelers to "untrained ICE agents" that could "create chaos at airports," and view the deployment as a political stunt distracting from the real issue of reforming ICE.
Right says: The Trump administration blamed Democrats for the "pointless, reckless shutdown" that has hurt TSA officers, and views ICE deployment as an immediate, practical solution using already-funded personnel to ease airport congestion.
✓ Common Ground
Both sides acknowledge that ICE officers are not trained to use magnetometers or X-ray machines, and are trained in crowd control, monitoring lines and checking IDs.
Both sides recognize the severity of TSA staffing shortages, with more than 400 TSA officers having left their jobs and thousands calling out from work.
Some voices on both sides, such as Republican Senator John Kennedy, acknowledge that while ICE deployment could help with crowd control, it is not a definitive solution to the underlying problem of TSA staffing.
Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski expressed concern about the ICE plan, saying "what we need to do is, we need to get the DHS issues resolved, we need to get the TSA agents paid" and asked "Do you really want to have even additional tensions on top of what we are already facing?"
Objective Deep Dive

This confrontation reveals a fundamental breakdown in how both parties frame emergency governance. The immediate crisis—TSA staff attrition causing security delays—is indisputable. What divides the parties is whether treating the symptom (staffing gaps via ICE) is acceptable without addressing the underlying political impasse over ICE reforms.

The left's position rests on two pillars: (1) ICE agents objectively lack aviation security training that takes months to develop, and (2) deploying the very agency whose conduct triggered the shutdown signals bad faith negotiating and could demoralize TSA workers. The claim has empirical support—TSA training includes explosives detection, threat assessment, and recertification protocols distinct from general law enforcement. However, the left underestimates what ICE agents can accomplish in narrowly defined roles (crowd control, exit monitoring, ID checking) that don't require X-ray certification. The deeper Democratic critique—that this is a distraction from forcing payment—carries weight given that ICE deployment does nothing to resolve the shutdown or end nonpayment. Yet Democrats have also shown limited appetite for splitting off TSA funding without broader ICE concessions, so the tactical position is not purely about worker welfare.

The right's position emphasizes available resources and unblocking immediate congestion. The fact that ICE has current appropriations while TSA does not is a genuine administrative reality. Homan's claim that ICE agents can handle exits/entrances without specialized training is reasonable for that narrow scope. However, Republicans overstate the magnitude of relief (former ICE Director Sandweg suggests the operational impact is minimal) and sidestep the optics problem: deploying the agency that killed two Americans to fix the airport crisis it helped cause is politically tone-deaf even if tactically sound. Republicans also conflate "Democrats blocking DHS" with "Democrats refusing full-scope funding without reform conditions"—two different claims. Democrats genuinely have offered standalone TSA funding; Republicans blocked it to preserve leverage on ICE. Both sides are negotiating, not one obstruction-free.

What remains unresolved: whether ICE agents will actually perform any immigration enforcement at airports (Homan said "we do immigration enforcement at airports all the time"), whether the deployment will demoralize TSA workers further, and whether the moderate effectiveness (crowd help, not screening help) justifies the political cost. A reported arrest at San Francisco airport on March 23 suggests mission creep concerns are not theoretical. The next critical date is March 27, when another TSA paycheck cycle arrives; more resignations are likely if the shutdown persists. Both parties face electoral risk—Republicans from appearing to exploit TSA suffering for anti-immigrant positioning, Democrats from appearing to weaponize worker welfare for immigration policy leverage.

◈ Tone Comparison

Democratic rhetoric emphasizes safety risks and training gaps, using phrases like "untrained agents," "brutalize," and "create chaos" to convey urgency and alarm. Republican messaging focuses on action and pragmatism, using phrases like "taking action," "already funded," and blaming "Radical Left Democrats" for obstruction. Democrats invoke worker welfare and substantive policy change; Republicans emphasize immediate problem-solving and leverage their existing fiscal position (ICE's continued funding through prior congressional action).

✕ Key Disagreements
Whether ICE agents have adequate training for airport assistance roles
Left: It takes four to six months to train and certify TSA officers, according to DHS, a process ICE agents have not undergone. TSA officers spend months learning to detect explosives, weapons, and threats specifically designed to evade detection at checkpoints—skills that require specialized instruction, hands-on practice, and ongoing recertification. "You cannot improvise that."
Right: Duffy said that ICE does have proper security training, but could also help by just managing lines. Homan asserted that "certainly a highly trained ICE law enforcement officer can cover an exit. Make sure people don't go through those exits, enter an airport through the exits and stuff like that, relieves that TSA officer to go to screening and to reduce those lines."
Whether Democrats are blocking DHS funding or Republicans are refusing selective funding
Left: Democrats argue they "want to pay TSA workers ASAP, with no strings attached," offering to fund TSA while continuing negotiations on ICE reforms. The Democratic leader also suggested funding TSA and all other DHS subagencies, with the exception of ICE and Customs and Border Protection. Democrats have tried to advance such a bill several times, but Republicans have stymied the legislation, fearing they would lose leverage to eventually fund ICE and CBP.
Right: Republicans argue that they need to fund all parts of DHS, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing Democrats' demands as an effort akin to seeking to defund the police, and Republicans contend that all of the DHS needs to be funded, not just parts. Homan blamed Democrats, saying "We're there to help the American people transit those lines that are taking hours, because the Democrats shut the government down."
Whether ICE deployment is a political stunt or a practical interim solution
Left: A former acting ICE Director John Sandweg told CNN that ICE agents assisting TSA officers with airport security is likely a political stunt and won't do much to help alleviate hourslong wait times. Sandweg warned that "ICE's contributions wouldn't be that operationally significant."
Right: Trump told NewsNation that ICE agents will be helping out at airports "for as long as it takes," and that "Now that I did this, the Democrats want to make a deal." Republicans view the deployment as leveraging existing resources to demonstrate action while negotiations continue.
The cause of the shutdown and who bears responsibility
Left: Democrats argue that "Republicans and the White House have decided they would rather shut down all of DHS than pass some very basic reforms to rein in ICE and Border Patrol," citing that "we heard horror stories of masked agents dragging away American citizens for no reason."
Right: Trump said "the Radical Left Democrats, who are only focused on protecting hard line criminals who have entered our Country illegally, are endangering the USA by holding back the money," and a DHS spokesperson blamed Democrats for putting "the safety, dependability, and ease of our air travel at risk."