New York amendments expand Democratic redistricting power

New York's Democratic-led legislature took its first step toward passing a constitutional amendment giving lawmakers more authority on redistricting.

Objective Facts

The Democratic-led state legislature on Wednesday night took its first step toward passing a constitutional amendment that would give lawmakers more authority on redistricting, with state lawmakers giving preliminary approval to a constitutional amendment that would provide them with more map-drawing power. The amendment keeps the state's independent redistricting commission in place while revising the map-drawing process to give state lawmakers more influence, allowing state lawmakers to introduce new congressional lines if the redistricting commission's initial attempt is rejected, and removes a provision that essentially bans partisan gerrymandering. If the amendment clears these hurdles, New York lawmakers could draw a new map with as many as four new Democratic-leaning seats ahead of the 2028 elections, reversing an approach of handing redistricting power to an independent commission a decade ago. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court ruling on Louisiana v. Callais that effectively gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Left-Leaning Perspective

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has been at the forefront of pushing Democrats to retaliate against Republicans who have attempted to redraw maps in other states like North Carolina and Texas, and defended the proposed amendment, stating: "Democrats promised a forceful, ongoing and multi-state response to Republican efforts to gerrymander the national congressional map and rig House elections." Governor Kathy Hochul expressed support, writing that "New Yorkers have a voice in the process," and Rep. Joe Morelle stated that the important thing was ensuring "that New Yorkers will get the chance to respond to what I think many of them feel, which is that hyper-partisan redistricting particularly in the South which is eliminating Black representation at an alarming rate, that New Yorkers are disadvantaged by this." Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie defended the amendment arguing New York should not unilaterally limit itself while other states pursue aggressive redistricting, stating "I think this thing about asking New York to play fair while everybody else is playing ruthless – I think it's not right to ask us this," and "I'm going to play fair based on how other people play," referring to Supreme Court decisions weakening the Voting Rights Act. Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins expressed that "We cannot ignore the reality that Republicans have repeatedly sought to undermine democracy through various attempts to gain political advantage," and "At a time when democracy is under attack across the country, we have a responsibility to protect all voters including the minority communities." Left-leaning coverage emphasizes the defensive nature of New York's action and frames it as necessary response to Republican aggression in other states. However, the coverage does not feature criticism from prominent left-leaning figures about the amendment's scope or mechanics, nor does it prominently feature independent good-government perspectives that expressed concern about the amendment's breadth.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Republicans in the state held a joint press conference in the Capitol with U.S. Congressmember Mike Lawler, excoriating Democrats for their efforts to gerrymander future maps, with the GOP blaming Democrats for first reopening the redistricting process with a constitutional amendment that voters rejected in 2021, and Assembly Minority Leader Ed Ra stating "This fight was started here." Lawler argued that New York Democrats kicked off mid-decade redistricting with their 2024 changes and claimed: "Democrats in New York have tried multiple times, multiple times to change the maps, multiple times to get a partisan advantage in New York because they have absolute power and they think they can get away with it." Multiple Republicans acknowledged they did not condone Trump's conduct in pushing for mid-decade redraws in other states, with State Sen. Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick saying "What has been done in the other states is wrong, but we should not be doing the same thing," and Assemblymember Josh Jensen echoing that "If another state manipulates its maps for partisan gain, that doesn't make it virtuous" and "If Republicans somewhere do something wrong, Democrats doing the same thing doesn't make it right." Assembly Minority Leader Ed Ra contended the amendment is "about making New York less competitive in our congressional elections so they can squeeze (out) as many Democratic representatives as they possibly can, and that's wrong for New Yorkers, and it should be rejected by New Yorkers." Right-leaning coverage emphasizes historical grievance, citing Democrats' own failed 2021 amendment and 2022 redistricting efforts as evidence of hypocrisy. Some conservative voices acknowledge the legitimacy of Republican mid-decade redistricting critiques, creating internal tension within right-leaning opposition.

Deep Dive

The specific angle of this story centers on New York Democrats' attempt to reclaim redistricting power from an independent commission they themselves created through constitutional amendment in 2014. The amendment passed Wednesday represents a dramatic reversal in strategy driven by three converging factors: (1) the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which enabled Southern Republican-led states to eliminate majority-Black districts; (2) Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Texas and other GOP-controlled states beginning in 2025; and (3) New York Democrats' own painful experience in 2022-2024 when courts threw out their first partisan map and allowed a court-appointed expert to draw maps that handed Republicans three House seats. Each side's argument contains legitimate points that the other largely ignores. Democrats correctly identify that the legal landscape has shifted—the Supreme Court has removed federal Voting Rights Act protections, and Republican states have acted aggressively on redistricting. Their counter-argument that New York should not unilaterally disarm has some force given the national stakes for House control. However, they downplay the scope of what they're proposing: permanently removing anti-gerrymandering constitutional language, not just for this cycle but for decades, which goes further than California or Virginia initiatives and represents abandonment of the 2014 reform model voters approved. Republicans correctly note that New York Democrats initiated the recent conflict (through their 2021 failed amendment and aggressive 2022 maps), but they do not adequately distinguish between defensive response and offensive expansion of gerrymandering authority. The good-government critique—that the amendment is unnecessarily broad in removing anti-gerrymandering language for state legislative as well as congressional districts—remains largely unaddressed by Democratic leadership. What comes next: The amendment must pass again in 2027 (after the newly elected 2026 legislature takes office) and then go to voters in a ballot referendum in 2027. Both sides are preparing for a multimillion-dollar campaign. The outcome will depend partly on national political conditions and partly on whether voters view the amendment as justified response to Republican aggression or as Democrats cynically abandoning principles they championed in 2014. Republicans, having voted unanimously against it this week, are committed to defeating it at the ballot box.

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisPolicy GuideAll StoriesCommunity PicksUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyAbout

New York amendments expand Democratic redistricting power

New York's Democratic-led legislature took its first step toward passing a constitutional amendment giving lawmakers more authority on redistricting.

Jun 4, 2026· Updated Jun 5, 2026
What's Going On

The Democratic-led state legislature on Wednesday night took its first step toward passing a constitutional amendment that would give lawmakers more authority on redistricting, with state lawmakers giving preliminary approval to a constitutional amendment that would provide them with more map-drawing power. The amendment keeps the state's independent redistricting commission in place while revising the map-drawing process to give state lawmakers more influence, allowing state lawmakers to introduce new congressional lines if the redistricting commission's initial attempt is rejected, and removes a provision that essentially bans partisan gerrymandering. If the amendment clears these hurdles, New York lawmakers could draw a new map with as many as four new Democratic-leaning seats ahead of the 2028 elections, reversing an approach of handing redistricting power to an independent commission a decade ago. The move comes weeks after the Supreme Court ruling on Louisiana v. Callais that effectively gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Left says: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries defended the amendment as a "forceful, ongoing and multi-state response to Republican efforts to gerrymander the national congressional map and rig House elections."
Right says: Assembly Minority Leader Ed Ra contended "This fight was started here," and argued the amendment is "about making New York less competitive in our congressional elections so they can squeeze (out) as many Democratic representatives as they possibly can."
✓ Common Ground
Multiple Republicans in the New York legislature acknowledged that they did not condone Trump's conduct in pushing for mid-decade redraws in other states, showing some shared concern about the legitimacy of Republican redistricting tactics elsewhere.
Good-government groups including Citizens Union—traditionally allied with reform-minded voices across the spectrum—raised concern that the amendment was unnecessarily broad, with executive director Grace Rauh stating it is indefensible that anti-gerrymandering provisions would be removed for state legislative seats as well as congressional districts and that "Lawmakers had other options."
Some voices across the aisle have noted the cyclical and escalatory nature of redistricting warfare; Rep. Joe Morelle described the situation as "an existential threat to this democracy," while one observer quoted in coverage noted that "What's going on right now, either from a Republican state or a Democrat state … it's just leading to political warfare through redistricting."
Objective Deep Dive

The specific angle of this story centers on New York Democrats' attempt to reclaim redistricting power from an independent commission they themselves created through constitutional amendment in 2014. The amendment passed Wednesday represents a dramatic reversal in strategy driven by three converging factors: (1) the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which enabled Southern Republican-led states to eliminate majority-Black districts; (2) Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Texas and other GOP-controlled states beginning in 2025; and (3) New York Democrats' own painful experience in 2022-2024 when courts threw out their first partisan map and allowed a court-appointed expert to draw maps that handed Republicans three House seats.

Each side's argument contains legitimate points that the other largely ignores. Democrats correctly identify that the legal landscape has shifted—the Supreme Court has removed federal Voting Rights Act protections, and Republican states have acted aggressively on redistricting. Their counter-argument that New York should not unilaterally disarm has some force given the national stakes for House control. However, they downplay the scope of what they're proposing: permanently removing anti-gerrymandering constitutional language, not just for this cycle but for decades, which goes further than California or Virginia initiatives and represents abandonment of the 2014 reform model voters approved. Republicans correctly note that New York Democrats initiated the recent conflict (through their 2021 failed amendment and aggressive 2022 maps), but they do not adequately distinguish between defensive response and offensive expansion of gerrymandering authority. The good-government critique—that the amendment is unnecessarily broad in removing anti-gerrymandering language for state legislative as well as congressional districts—remains largely unaddressed by Democratic leadership.

What comes next: The amendment must pass again in 2027 (after the newly elected 2026 legislature takes office) and then go to voters in a ballot referendum in 2027. Both sides are preparing for a multimillion-dollar campaign. The outcome will depend partly on national political conditions and partly on whether voters view the amendment as justified response to Republican aggression or as Democrats cynically abandoning principles they championed in 2014. Republicans, having voted unanimously against it this week, are committed to defeating it at the ballot box.

◈ Tone Comparison

Democratic messaging uses high-stakes security language ("attack across the country," "unilaterally disarm") and frames the action as necessary defensive response. Republican messaging emphasizes historical grievance and repetition ("tried multiple times, multiple times") and charges hypocrisy. Notably, some Republicans qualify their opposition by acknowledging the problematic nature of Republican gerrymandering elsewhere, creating internal tension in right-wing framing.