Singer D4vd Charged with First-Degree Murder

Singer D4vd pleads not guilty to first-degree murder charges in death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, facing possible death penalty.

Objective Facts

Singer and songwriter d4vd has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, whose dismembered body was found in a Tesla belonging to the musician last year. Celeste had gone to the singer's house in the Hollywood Hills on April 23, 2025. "She was never heard from again," Hochman said. The charges include first-degree murder with special circumstances, lewd and lascivious acts with an individual under 14 and mutilating a body. The murder charges included special circumstances — lying in wait, committing the crime for financial gain and murdering the witness in an investigation. In a statement Monday evening, Blair Berk – one of d4vd's attorneys – wrote, "The actual evidence in this case will show that David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez and he was not the cause of her death."

Left-Leaning Perspective

This is a criminal justice case that has not generated partisan left-leaning commentary in the available sources. The coverage from major outlets including CNN, MSNBC, and others has focused on reporting the facts of the charges, evidence presented by District Attorney Nathan Hochman, and the defense's position. No left-leaning outlet has staked out a distinct political position on D4vd's guilt, innocence, or the appropriateness of the charges announced on April 20, 2026. Instead, coverage has centered on legal analysis rather than ideology. Legal experts quoted in coverage discuss case strategy and evidence strength without partisan framing. The case involves a crime against a minor and allegations of sexual abuse—matters that typically transcend partisan divides in criminal justice coverage. Without identifiable left-leaning commentary, analysis, or argument on this specific story angle—D4vd's not guilty plea and the charges he faces—this section cannot be responsibly completed.

Right-Leaning Perspective

This is a criminal justice case that has not generated partisan right-leaning commentary in the available sources. Fox News and other conservative outlets have reported the charges, the defense response, and DA Hochman's statements factually without staking out a distinctive ideological position on the case. Instead, coverage has focused on reporting the charges, the evidence framework prosecutors described, and the defense's assertion of innocence. No right-leaning outlet has used this case to argue broader points about criminal justice policy, prosecutorial overreach, or defense rights in a way that distinguishes it from factual reporting. The case itself—involving a 14-year-old victim and allegations of sexual abuse and murder—has not become a proxy for partisan debate in the available sources. Criminal cases of this severity typically receive neutral coverage across outlets. Without identifiable right-leaning commentary, analysis, or argument on this specific story angle—D4vd's not guilty plea and the charges he faces—this section cannot be responsibly completed.

Deep Dive

The specific angle of D4vd's arraignment on April 20, 2026—his not guilty plea and the charges he faces—exists within a broader criminal investigation that has been largely sealed and secret since Celeste Rivas Hernandez's body was discovered in September 2025. The seven-month gap between discovery and charges reflects the challenge of building a forensically sound case when a body has decomposed significantly. "The substantial amount of time that passed between her death and the discovery meant that crucial evidence had degraded or disappeared, and as detectives worked to uncover the truth, they also had to sift through and debunk a great deal of false information circulating publicly," LAPD Chief McDonnell said. What makes this case significant legally is the special circumstances filing. Prosecutors appear to be arguing that preserving Burke's earnings, brand value and future commercial success amounted to a financial motive. Under California law, a murder committed for financial gain can trigger enhanced penalties. The "murdering a witness" special circumstance is particularly notable—prosecutors allege Celeste was killed partly because she could testify about her own sexual abuse. This dual motive theory (career protection + witness elimination) is what prosecutors must prove beyond reasonable doubt. The defense strategy, articulated through attorney Blair Berk and reinforced in discovery disputes, focuses on challenging whether evidence can actually prove D4vd committed the murder. Before the judge, Berk lamented the lack of discovery the defense has received so far, and at the same time, as Silverman objected that the evidence collected so far was "voluminous" noted the DA's office had the time for a detailed press conference on the case earlier Monday. As Silverman cast doubt on there being much material available for a planned follow up hearing later this week, Berk asked the prosecution to endeavor with "conscientious earnestness" to get as much discovery as possible to her team. This suggests a preliminary hearing strategy focused on testing the evidence chain. What comes next matters significantly: Attorneys for Burke requested an open preliminary hearing, saying they have received little to no discovery ahead of the arraignment on Monday. His defense added that it would like to see transcripts from the grand jury proceedings. The preliminary hearing will likely determine whether prosecutors have sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. Public release of the medical examiner's report on cause of death—currently sealed—could also shift legal positioning for both sides.

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisAll StoriesCommunity PicksUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyAbout

Singer D4vd Charged with First-Degree Murder

Singer D4vd pleads not guilty to first-degree murder charges in death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, facing possible death penalty.

Apr 20, 2026· Updated Apr 21, 2026
What's Going On

Singer and songwriter d4vd has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, whose dismembered body was found in a Tesla belonging to the musician last year. Celeste had gone to the singer's house in the Hollywood Hills on April 23, 2025. "She was never heard from again," Hochman said. The charges include first-degree murder with special circumstances, lewd and lascivious acts with an individual under 14 and mutilating a body. The murder charges included special circumstances — lying in wait, committing the crime for financial gain and murdering the witness in an investigation. In a statement Monday evening, Blair Berk – one of d4vd's attorneys – wrote, "The actual evidence in this case will show that David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez and he was not the cause of her death."

Left says: No distinct left-leaning perspective on this specific case angle could be identified from available coverage. News outlets have covered the arraignment factually without partisan framing.
Right says: No distinct right-leaning perspective on this specific case angle could be identified from available coverage. News outlets have covered the arraignment factually without partisan framing.
✓ Common Ground
Both prosecution and defense agree that Hochman says his prosecutors are ready to prove the theory beyond a reasonable doubt and defense lawyer Blair Berk told the judge and attendees that "We believe the actual evidence will show David Burke did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez."—both sides are committed to presenting evidence in court.
A number of legal analysts and commentators, regardless of perspective, acknowledge that "What I expect the defense to argue is to say, 'Look, you guys had this case in September or October. It's been a long time, and you don't really have the smoking gun. You're just piecing together circumstances rather than telling people how exactly she died, and what exactly D4vd did,'" according to former prosecutor turned criminal defense attorney R.J. Dreiling.
Both the prosecution and legal analysts agree on the significance of the evidence gap: "The substantial amount of time that passed between her death and the discovery meant that crucial evidence had degraded or disappeared, and as detectives worked to uncover the truth, they also had to sift through and debunk a great deal of false information circulating publicly," McDonnell added.
Objective Deep Dive

The specific angle of D4vd's arraignment on April 20, 2026—his not guilty plea and the charges he faces—exists within a broader criminal investigation that has been largely sealed and secret since Celeste Rivas Hernandez's body was discovered in September 2025. The seven-month gap between discovery and charges reflects the challenge of building a forensically sound case when a body has decomposed significantly. "The substantial amount of time that passed between her death and the discovery meant that crucial evidence had degraded or disappeared, and as detectives worked to uncover the truth, they also had to sift through and debunk a great deal of false information circulating publicly," LAPD Chief McDonnell said.

What makes this case significant legally is the special circumstances filing. Prosecutors appear to be arguing that preserving Burke's earnings, brand value and future commercial success amounted to a financial motive. Under California law, a murder committed for financial gain can trigger enhanced penalties. The "murdering a witness" special circumstance is particularly notable—prosecutors allege Celeste was killed partly because she could testify about her own sexual abuse. This dual motive theory (career protection + witness elimination) is what prosecutors must prove beyond reasonable doubt.

The defense strategy, articulated through attorney Blair Berk and reinforced in discovery disputes, focuses on challenging whether evidence can actually prove D4vd committed the murder. Before the judge, Berk lamented the lack of discovery the defense has received so far, and at the same time, as Silverman objected that the evidence collected so far was "voluminous" noted the DA's office had the time for a detailed press conference on the case earlier Monday. As Silverman cast doubt on there being much material available for a planned follow up hearing later this week, Berk asked the prosecution to endeavor with "conscientious earnestness" to get as much discovery as possible to her team. This suggests a preliminary hearing strategy focused on testing the evidence chain.

What comes next matters significantly: Attorneys for Burke requested an open preliminary hearing, saying they have received little to no discovery ahead of the arraignment on Monday. His defense added that it would like to see transcripts from the grand jury proceedings. The preliminary hearing will likely determine whether prosecutors have sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. Public release of the medical examiner's report on cause of death—currently sealed—could also shift legal positioning for both sides.

◈ Tone Comparison

Coverage across all outlets uses similar factual, legal language when reporting on the charges and defense response. Neither left-leaning nor right-leaning sources have adopted distinctive tone or framing on this arraignment.