States sue to block $3.5 billion Nexstar-Tegna media merger

Eight Democratic-led states sued to block a $3.5 billion Nexstar-Tegna merger after the FCC approved it, citing antitrust concerns and threats to local journalism.

Objective Facts

Attorneys general from eight states asked a federal judge to halt a $3.5 billion merger between Nexstar Media Group and Tegna, two of the largest local broadcast station owners in the U.S. The Trump administration approved the merger on Thursday after the FCC waived rules limiting any company from owning stations that, taken together, reach more than 39% of U.S. households. Eight states asked a U.S. judge on Friday to issue a temporary restraining order to stop the $3.5 billion merger of Nexstar Media Group and Tegna. Nexstar said it has completed its acquisition of Tegna, uniting two of the largest TV station ownership groups in the United States. The states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, and the attorneys general for all eight states are Democrats.

Left-Leaning Perspective

The attorneys general of California, New York and Illinois emphasized the sprawling nature of Nexstar and Tegna's combined footprint, which entails stations in 44 states, and argued that the Nexstar-Tegna deal threatens local journalism, noting recent layoffs at Nexstar-owned newsrooms in Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York. They stated, "We all benefit when local newsrooms compete to break stories, investigate wrongdoing, and keep the public informed – and that is exactly what this merger puts at risk." Historically, when Nexstar buys a second TV station in a market, it fires the entire staff and runs the same news content across the two stations, with the company calling this part of "The Nexstar Consolidation Playbook" in calls with investors. Bonta said the merger would be a "gut punch to a thriving democracy that relies on an informed population," while Trump, who sounded skeptical of the Nexstar-Tegna combination last fall, changed his tune in February when he wrote on Truth Social that Nexstar's acquisition "will help knock out the Fake News because there will be more competition." The coalition of state attorneys general highlighted the Trump administration's support for the deal, with Bonta saying that "leaves it to us to take these important steps." As seen with the Kimmel situation, where Nexstar curried favor with a conservative administration to get its merger passed, the company has no problem biasing its product for political convenience. FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez said "The consequences of this rubber stamp approval will be felt in living rooms and newsrooms across the country, resulting in fewer voices, less competition, and higher costs for consumers." However, the left does not directly address the broadcasters' argument that scale is necessary to compete with tech platforms, and some analyses focus heavily on the Kimmel incident rather than substantive antitrust economics.

Right-Leaning Perspective

FCC Chairman Carr said that "if you care about local news, you should care about the future of local broadcast stations," and stated the deal will ensure that the broadcasters have the resources to continue investing in those operations. Nexstar CEO Perry Sook said the company will be a stronger company, "better positioned to deliver exceptional journalism and local programming." Nexstar said the Trump administration's policies gave station owners "the opportunity to expand reach, level the playing field, and compete more effectively with the Big Tech and legacy Big Media companies," and the National Association of Broadcasters said the waiver was a "meaningful sign that the Commission understands the urgent need for ownership reform." Defenders of the deal argued the current FCC ownership cap prevents broadcasters from competing with unregulated tech companies like Amazon, Google and Netflix in the modern media ecosystem, with the National Association of Broadcasters telling lawmakers, "Over the past decade, as broadcasters gained modest additional scale, the number of local news telecasts and hours of locally produced news increased substantially." Trump endorsed the merger, writing that "we need more competition against THE ENEMY, the Fake News National TV Networks." However, right-leaning outlets provide limited independent analysis. The primary right-aligned voice—Trump and his FCC Chair Carr—frame the deal through the lens of competing against "fake news" networks rather than substantive media economics. The right does not address the specific consolidation pattern evidence cited by critics, such as Nexstar's documented practice of firing entire newsroom staffs when acquiring multiple stations in a market.

Deep Dive

The merger approval process itself became controversial when it emerged that Nexstar temporarily pulled "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" off the air across its 28 ABC affiliates after FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke the licenses of broadcasters airing Kimmel. This incident occurred within the broader context of Trump sounding skeptical of the Nexstar-Tegna combination last fall, but changing his tune in February when he wrote on Truth Social that Nexstar's acquisition "will help knock out the Fake News." This timeline suggests the approval may have been influenced by Nexstar's willingness to align with the Trump administration's media criticism rather than by neutral regulatory assessment. The core economic disagreement centers on whether broadcaster consolidation strengthens or weakens local news. Right-side evidence points to data showing increased local news production overall, while left-side evidence points to Nexstar's specific practice of firing entire newsroom staffs when consolidating multiple stations in a market and what the company calls its "Nexstar Consolidation Playbook." Both sides may be correct: consolidated companies may invest more in technology and resources (right's argument), while simultaneously reducing staff and editorial independence (left's argument), resulting in a net loss of journalism quality even if hours of broadcast content remain constant. A critical overlooked issue is retransmission fees: while the states focus on local news consolidation in specific markets, station ownership groups negotiate fees on a national basis, meaning the merger will increase consumer cable and satellite prices even in markets where it does not change local ownership concentration. This represents the first of several cases where states are at odds with pay-to-play federal antitrust enforcement, raising questions about whether state-level antitrust action can succeed against a federal government actively supporting the deal. Recent developments show Newsmax joining the legal challenge, describing Carr's decision as one that "opens the door to the most massive TV consolidation in history – and is an affront to both legal process and the rule of law," revealing that even within conservative media, the merger faces significant opposition on procedural and competitive grounds.

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

States sue to block $3.5 billion Nexstar-Tegna media merger

Eight Democratic-led states sued to block a $3.5 billion Nexstar-Tegna merger after the FCC approved it, citing antitrust concerns and threats to local journalism.

Mar 20, 2026· Updated Mar 23, 2026
What's Going On

Attorneys general from eight states asked a federal judge to halt a $3.5 billion merger between Nexstar Media Group and Tegna, two of the largest local broadcast station owners in the U.S. The Trump administration approved the merger on Thursday after the FCC waived rules limiting any company from owning stations that, taken together, reach more than 39% of U.S. households. Eight states asked a U.S. judge on Friday to issue a temporary restraining order to stop the $3.5 billion merger of Nexstar Media Group and Tegna. Nexstar said it has completed its acquisition of Tegna, uniting two of the largest TV station ownership groups in the United States. The states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, and the attorneys general for all eight states are Democrats.

Left says: California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated, "This merger is illegal, plain and simple, running contrary to federal antitrust laws that protect consumers." State officials say the merger will hurt consumers by hiking prices and weakening local news coverage.
Right says: Nexstar said the Trump administration's deregulatory policies gave station owners "the opportunity to expand reach, level the playing field, and compete more effectively with the Big Tech and legacy Big Media companies." The National Association of Broadcasters said the waiver granted to Nexstar was a "meaningful sign that the Commission understands the urgent need for ownership reform."
✓ Common Ground
Some voices across the aisle acknowledge Nexstar's role in the Jimmy Kimmel situation as a notable corporate action of political consequence.
The merger created a schism in conservative media, with Newsmax and One America News Network lobbying hard against the deal. This shows that opposition to the merger is not exclusively left-leaning.
There appears to be shared understanding that local news investment commitments are relevant to the merger discussion, with the FCC securing Nexstar's commitment to increasing local news in acquired markets.
Some groups across the spectrum, like America's Communications Association representing smaller cable operators, weighed in support of the lawsuit, stating "This further skewing of the marketplace will hit smaller cable operators and their largely rural customer base the hardest."
Objective Deep Dive

The merger approval process itself became controversial when it emerged that Nexstar temporarily pulled "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" off the air across its 28 ABC affiliates after FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke the licenses of broadcasters airing Kimmel. This incident occurred within the broader context of Trump sounding skeptical of the Nexstar-Tegna combination last fall, but changing his tune in February when he wrote on Truth Social that Nexstar's acquisition "will help knock out the Fake News." This timeline suggests the approval may have been influenced by Nexstar's willingness to align with the Trump administration's media criticism rather than by neutral regulatory assessment.

The core economic disagreement centers on whether broadcaster consolidation strengthens or weakens local news. Right-side evidence points to data showing increased local news production overall, while left-side evidence points to Nexstar's specific practice of firing entire newsroom staffs when consolidating multiple stations in a market and what the company calls its "Nexstar Consolidation Playbook." Both sides may be correct: consolidated companies may invest more in technology and resources (right's argument), while simultaneously reducing staff and editorial independence (left's argument), resulting in a net loss of journalism quality even if hours of broadcast content remain constant.

A critical overlooked issue is retransmission fees: while the states focus on local news consolidation in specific markets, station ownership groups negotiate fees on a national basis, meaning the merger will increase consumer cable and satellite prices even in markets where it does not change local ownership concentration. This represents the first of several cases where states are at odds with pay-to-play federal antitrust enforcement, raising questions about whether state-level antitrust action can succeed against a federal government actively supporting the deal. Recent developments show Newsmax joining the legal challenge, describing Carr's decision as one that "opens the door to the most massive TV consolidation in history – and is an affront to both legal process and the rule of law," revealing that even within conservative media, the merger faces significant opposition on procedural and competitive grounds.

◈ Tone Comparison

Left-leaning coverage employs urgent, protective language emphasizing systemic harm to democracy and journalism—words like "gut punch to a thriving democracy" and "disastrous"—while framing the approval process as illegitimate and politically motivated. Right-leaning messaging uses positive framing around empowerment and resilience, with language about "promoting competition, localism, and diversity," while relying more heavily on Trump's antagonistic stance toward "Fake News" networks than on substantive economic analysis.

✕ Key Disagreements
Whether consolidation reduces or increases local news production
Left: Left critics argue that given Nexstar's tendency to consolidate newsrooms in communities where it owns more than one station, the merger would hurt the already struggling local news business, with newsrooms being consolidated, reporters laid off, and editorial decisions made far from the communities they serve.
Right: Right-side defenders argue that allowing broadcasters to achieve greater scale would not reduce local news, with data showing that over the past decade, as broadcasters gained modest additional scale, the number of local news telecasts and hours of locally produced news increased substantially.
Whether the FCC had authority to waive the ownership cap without Congress
Left: Critics argue the FCC lifting the station ownership cap will likely draw its own lawsuit, since its authority to do so is in question after Congress specifically set the cap in 2003, and it's precisely the kind of misinterpretation of a congressional mandate that the Supreme Court cited in eliminating agency deference in rulemaking.
Right: FCC Chairman Carr argued the agency was on solid legal footing in letting the merger go forward, saying that the D.C. Circuit "has already determined that the relevant media ownership regulation is an agency rule, not a firm statutory limit."
Whether the merger approval process was transparent and proper
Left: The FCC's lone Democratic commissioner, Anna Gomez, condemned what she called the "closed door" approval of the deal without a full commission vote, saying "The consequences of this rubber stamp approval will be felt in living rooms and newsrooms across the country, resulting in fewer voices, less competition, and higher costs for consumers."
Right: FCC Chairman Carr justified the waiver as "consistent with longstanding FCC authorities and doing so promotes the underlying purpose of the FCC's media regulations by promoting competition, localism, and diversity."
Whether retransmission fee leverage will increase consumer prices
Left: Critics note that retransmission fees have gone up 2,000 percent on a per-subscriber basis since 2010, and Nexstar executives have said they will leverage demand for live sports, local news, and other must-see broadcast content to maximize fees, with the CFO expecting $135 million in net retransmission fee revenue from the merger.
Right: Nexstar committed to offering pay-TV providers with which it has an existing retransmission agreement an extension of its agreement at the existing rates through November 30, 2026.