Trump administration restricts green card applicants from applying in U.S.

Trump administration restricts green card applicants already in U.S. from applying domestically, forcing most to return home for consular processing.

Objective Facts

On May 21, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued policy memorandum PM-602-0199 concerning green card applications filed within the United States. The policy requires foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily and want to apply to become lawful permanent residents to return home and apply there, except in "extraordinary circumstances." While the Trump administration presents the memo as a "reminder" to USCIS employees about existing law, it has also touted it as closing a "loophole" that could force more noncitizens to leave the country to apply for green cards. After initially presenting the policy as something that would affect most green-card applications, USCIS has stated that it will be implemented on a case-by-case basis, implying many immigrants will still be able to remain in the U.S. while applying for green cards.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Rep. Delia C. Ramirez, an Illinois Democrat, said the policy is "beyond cruel" and called for dismantling DHS "piece by piece," while New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said on X the new policy "betrays the very promise that built this country." Rep. Greg Stanton, an Arizona Democrat, stated on X that "Trump just made legal immigration harder — on purpose." PBS reported the announcement "potentially affects hundreds of thousands of green card applicants a year," and is "part of a pivot by the administration to target legal pathways to immigration," with immigration attorney Charles Kuck saying "this is simply an attempt to try to limit and scare people away from the legal immigration process." Former USCIS official Doug Rand said "the purpose of this policy is exclusion," pointing out that since "Trump has banned people from over 100 countries from returning to the U.S., forcing them to go abroad for consular processing is no pathway at all," while NBC News noted Rand's concern that the policy affects roughly half of the typical 1 million annual green card applicants. Left-leaning coverage emphasizes family separation and the conflict between temporary visa programs and green card pathways, focusing on how the policy converts legal pathways into impossible ones for nationals of banned countries.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Fox News reports that the Trump administration's position is that when noncitizens enter via student visas, tourist visas or temporary work status, they should leave once that term expires, with USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler stating "We're returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation's immigration system properly" and "from now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a green card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances." USCIS Kahler argued the policy "allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes," noting that "when aliens apply from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who decide to slip into the shadows and remain in the U.S.," and stated "Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers, or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose. Their visit should not function as the first step in the Green Card process." Radio host Larry Elder told Fox & Friends that "immigrants coming into this country are supposed to benefit us and not benefit them," and argued "our welfare state is bigger than ever and it is incompatible to have porous borders and a welfare state," questioning "if you come here, you ought not to be a charge on taxpayers. Why is that so controversial?" Right-leaning coverage frames the policy as returning to the statutory framework and preventing abuse of temporary visa status.

Deep Dive

Prior to the new policy, people living legally in the U.S. on nonimmigrant visas could later become eligible for green cards through family sponsorship, employment or other immigrant pathways via a process known as adjustment of status, which could be done without leaving the country. The policy marks the latest step by the Trump administration making legal immigration more difficult for foreigners already in the U.S. and for those hoping to come here. The Trump administration presents this as a clarification of existing law rather than a policy change, yet immigration experts note substantial disagreement with USCIS' assertion that this policy is consistent with the law as enacted by Congress, and the agency has effectively changed substantive policy without providing advance notice and opportunity to comment through rulemaking. After initially presenting the policy as something that would affect most green-card applications, USCIS stated it will be implemented on a case-by-case basis, implying that many immigrants will still be able to remain in the U.S. while applying for green cards. USCIS spokesman Zach Kahler noted that green card applicants who "provide an economic benefit or otherwise are in the national interest" aren't likely to be displaced by the policy, while others "may be asked to apply abroad depending on individualized circumstances." This discretionary approach has left substantial uncertainty about implementation. This overall uncertainty is likely to discourage applicants, employers, and families from pursuing adjustment of status or taking risks with immigration filings, representing a continuing pattern by the Trump administration to significantly narrow practical pathways to permanent residence. The memo is likely to face legal challenges given substantial disagreement about whether it is consistent with law, and legal challenges are anticipated with courts having the final say on how far this memo's reach extends. Civil liberty and legal groups are in discussions about filing a lawsuit to block implementation, with AILA certain a lawsuit or even several lawsuits will be filed, though litigation requires being "smart and methodical" with the right plaintiffs and partners and is "very resource intensive." Key unresolved questions include whether courts will accept USCIS' statutory interpretation, how the policy will affect pending applications, and what standards will determine "extraordinary circumstances."

OBJ SPEAKING

Create StoryTimelinesVoter ToolsRegional AnalysisPolicy GuideAll StoriesCommunity PicksUSWorldPoliticsBusinessHealthEntertainmentTechnologyAbout

Trump administration restricts green card applicants from applying in U.S.

Trump administration restricts green card applicants already in U.S. from applying domestically, forcing most to return home for consular processing.

Jun 1, 2026· Updated Jun 16, 2026
What's Going On

On May 21, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued policy memorandum PM-602-0199 concerning green card applications filed within the United States. The policy requires foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily and want to apply to become lawful permanent residents to return home and apply there, except in "extraordinary circumstances." While the Trump administration presents the memo as a "reminder" to USCIS employees about existing law, it has also touted it as closing a "loophole" that could force more noncitizens to leave the country to apply for green cards. After initially presenting the policy as something that would affect most green-card applications, USCIS has stated that it will be implemented on a case-by-case basis, implying many immigrants will still be able to remain in the U.S. while applying for green cards.

Left says: Democrats argue the policy is "beyond cruel" that "betrays the very promise that built this country," while immigration advocates warn it will separate families and deter legal immigration.
Right says: The Trump administration argues temporary visa holders are supposed to leave after their term expires and should not use temporary status as the first step toward getting a green card.
✓ Common Ground
Various observers across the spectrum acknowledge substantial uncertainty remains about the policy's implementation, with questions about what will happen to people who have already filed green card applications and who will face the most scrutiny.
Both immigration law specialists and critics recognize the memo will likely face legal challenges, with courts having the final say on how far this memo's reach extends.
Immigration advocates and employers share concern that the policy creates practical complications, with AILA executive director Ben Johnson stating "this policy doesn't just delay lives, it derails them," while legal analysis notes employers with immigration sponsorship programs may have limited exposure to consular processing and need to familiarize themselves with its nuances and challenges.
Objective Deep Dive

Prior to the new policy, people living legally in the U.S. on nonimmigrant visas could later become eligible for green cards through family sponsorship, employment or other immigrant pathways via a process known as adjustment of status, which could be done without leaving the country. The policy marks the latest step by the Trump administration making legal immigration more difficult for foreigners already in the U.S. and for those hoping to come here. The Trump administration presents this as a clarification of existing law rather than a policy change, yet immigration experts note substantial disagreement with USCIS' assertion that this policy is consistent with the law as enacted by Congress, and the agency has effectively changed substantive policy without providing advance notice and opportunity to comment through rulemaking.

After initially presenting the policy as something that would affect most green-card applications, USCIS stated it will be implemented on a case-by-case basis, implying that many immigrants will still be able to remain in the U.S. while applying for green cards. USCIS spokesman Zach Kahler noted that green card applicants who "provide an economic benefit or otherwise are in the national interest" aren't likely to be displaced by the policy, while others "may be asked to apply abroad depending on individualized circumstances." This discretionary approach has left substantial uncertainty about implementation. This overall uncertainty is likely to discourage applicants, employers, and families from pursuing adjustment of status or taking risks with immigration filings, representing a continuing pattern by the Trump administration to significantly narrow practical pathways to permanent residence.

The memo is likely to face legal challenges given substantial disagreement about whether it is consistent with law, and legal challenges are anticipated with courts having the final say on how far this memo's reach extends. Civil liberty and legal groups are in discussions about filing a lawsuit to block implementation, with AILA certain a lawsuit or even several lawsuits will be filed, though litigation requires being "smart and methodical" with the right plaintiffs and partners and is "very resource intensive." Key unresolved questions include whether courts will accept USCIS' statutory interpretation, how the policy will affect pending applications, and what standards will determine "extraordinary circumstances."

◈ Tone Comparison

Left-leaning outlets use emotive language like "beyond cruel" and "betrays," while right-leaning coverage employs more technical language like "returning to the original intent of the law" and "navigating our nation's immigration system properly."