U.S. Postal Service faces financial crisis, may stop deliveries within year

Objective Facts

Postmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers that the U.S. Postal Service is on track to run out of cash for paying its workers and vendors in about a year and may have to stop deliveries. USPS ended fiscal year 2025 with a net loss of $9 billion, and recently posted its fourth quarterly loss in a row ($1.3 billion). At a Tuesday hearing before the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations, Steiner presented urgent reform requests. USPS can take on no more debt under federal law, which has capped the agency's borrowing at $15 billion. A Government Accountability Office report released Tuesday said the Postal Service's business model is "unsustainable," and that "urgent action" is needed to get ahead of a looming cash crisis.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Democratic Representative Kweisi Mfume, the top Democrat on the subcommittee, said reforms were needed, stating: "We cannot let the U.S. Postal Service die," and adding Congress cannot "do nothing and watch the Titanic sink." The left emphasizes the urgency and criticality of congressional intervention. Rep. Kweisi Mfume of Maryland agreed that "One thing that is clear about all of this is we cannot let the United States Postal Service die." He said addressing the agency's debt limit seems inevitable, but details still need to be worked out. Left-leaning coverage stresses the impact on workers and rural communities who depend on mail delivery, and warns of the consequences of privatization. From a left perspective, privatization "would be a disaster for the country. And it would hit rural voters — who overwhelmingly supported Trump in all three of his elections — harder than anyone." The left argues that USPS is a public good and frames the crisis as structural, rooted in declining mail volumes and outdated funding mechanisms—not mismanagement.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Several House Republicans who played a critical role in passing the Postal Service Reform Act said they were skeptical of providing further assistance to USPS. Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said "Everything that you're talking about today, we did five years ago." Republicans question whether USPS has exhausted cost-cutting measures before requesting more borrowing authority. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, the subcommittee's chairman, emphasized that lawmakers would need more information before taking such action. "Congress needs to have confidence not only that [USPS will] be able to pay it back, but that they're on the right road to achieve financial security," he said. "For Congress to consider this request, the Postal Service must also prove that they have exhausted their [other] options already." The right frames the problem as one of institutional mismanagement and argues that further government intervention without demonstrated reforms would be irresponsible. Republican Representative Pete Sessions, who chaired the hearing, said he would work with USPS to address concerns but said he does not support raising stamp prices.

Deep Dive

The March 17 testimony marks a critical pivot point for USPS policy. Over the last 20 years, USPS mail volume fell nearly in half — from 213 billion pieces in 2006, to about 109 billion pieces today. If all that lost volume was paid at the current price of a stamp, that's about $81 billion. This structural decline is real and not attributable to recent management alone. However, what each side overlooks is instructive: the left minimizes that USPS's costly workforce and legacy obligations exist regardless of mail volume, while the right ignores that no private company could maintain universal service at 78-cent postage costs across 170 million addresses. Most countries maintain universal service by providing direct public funding to the designated universal service provider for these components. The United States does not. An explicit appropriation for the USO would align financing with the scope of the mandate rather than relying solely on cross-subsidy from declining letter volumes. The central unresolved question is whether Congress will expand borrowing authority (a short-term patch), raise stamp prices (which may accelerate privatization pressure), reduce service (politically costly), or restructure the entire funding model (difficult legislatively). Amazon plans to significantly reduce shipments via the United States Postal Service before its contract ends in October 2026, which could accelerate the crisis timeline and force decisions sooner than expected. Neither side has articulated a durable long-term solution; both are focused on whether and how to fund the next 12-24 months.

OBJ SPEAKING

← Daily BriefAbout

U.S. Postal Service faces financial crisis, may stop deliveries within year

Mar 17, 2026· Updated Mar 18, 2026
What's Going On

Postmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers that the U.S. Postal Service is on track to run out of cash for paying its workers and vendors in about a year and may have to stop deliveries. USPS ended fiscal year 2025 with a net loss of $9 billion, and recently posted its fourth quarterly loss in a row ($1.3 billion). At a Tuesday hearing before the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations, Steiner presented urgent reform requests. USPS can take on no more debt under federal law, which has capped the agency's borrowing at $15 billion. A Government Accountability Office report released Tuesday said the Postal Service's business model is "unsustainable," and that "urgent action" is needed to get ahead of a looming cash crisis.

Left says: Democrats emphasize that USPS continues to lose money "at an alarming rate, while performance has continued to suffer," with "Americans have to pay higher prices for a service that is not as good as it was last year." Democrats stress the need for Congress to act decisively and worry about threats to universal mail service.
Right says: Republicans note that the previous 10-year reform plan from former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy sought to "revive" USPS, but "those expectations were not reached." Several House Republicans who played a critical role in passing the Postal Service Reform Act said they were skeptical of providing further assistance to USPS.
✓ Common Ground
Both sides acknowledge lawmakers on both sides of the aisle agree that "it is in the best interest of Americans to address the agency's funding woes," though they disagreed on how much Congress should play a role.
Both Democrats and Republicans appear to accept that the Postal Service will not be able to fix its financial condition "on its own" and that "congressional action is going to be needed."
Several voices across the political spectrum acknowledge that structural changes to USPS's business model are necessary—whether addressing the universal service mandate, retiree benefit obligations, or the borrowing cap.
Across the aisle, there is agreement that "it is better to make those choices now rather than wait until crisis hits" and that "This pattern is not sustainable. Something has to change."
Both sides recognize that the 2022 Postal Service Reform Act, though providing relief, has proven insufficient to resolve the underlying structural financial challenges.
Objective Deep Dive

The March 17 testimony marks a critical pivot point for USPS policy. Over the last 20 years, USPS mail volume fell nearly in half — from 213 billion pieces in 2006, to about 109 billion pieces today. If all that lost volume was paid at the current price of a stamp, that's about $81 billion. This structural decline is real and not attributable to recent management alone. However, what each side overlooks is instructive: the left minimizes that USPS's costly workforce and legacy obligations exist regardless of mail volume, while the right ignores that no private company could maintain universal service at 78-cent postage costs across 170 million addresses. Most countries maintain universal service by providing direct public funding to the designated universal service provider for these components. The United States does not. An explicit appropriation for the USO would align financing with the scope of the mandate rather than relying solely on cross-subsidy from declining letter volumes. The central unresolved question is whether Congress will expand borrowing authority (a short-term patch), raise stamp prices (which may accelerate privatization pressure), reduce service (politically costly), or restructure the entire funding model (difficult legislatively). Amazon plans to significantly reduce shipments via the United States Postal Service before its contract ends in October 2026, which could accelerate the crisis timeline and force decisions sooner than expected. Neither side has articulated a durable long-term solution; both are focused on whether and how to fund the next 12-24 months.

◈ Tone Comparison

The left uses urgent, protective language—"we cannot let...die," "Titanic sink"—positioning government support as a moral imperative for a public good. The right uses cautious, accountability-focused language—"expectations were not reached," demands for proof of reform—questioning the postmaster general's credibility and framing further aid as requiring accountability first. The left frames the crisis as structural and inevitable given mail volume decline; the right frames it as a management failure that requires demonstrated effort before Congressional relief.

✕ Key Disagreements
Appropriate level of borrowing authority and conditions for granting it
Left: Democrats believe addressing the agency's debt limit seems inevitable and should move forward, viewing it as necessary breathing room to develop long-term solutions.
Right: Republicans require proof that "[USPS will] be able to pay it back, but that they're on the right road to achieve financial security" and that "the Postal Service must also prove that they have exhausted their [other] options already."
Stamp price increases as a solution
Left: Left-aligned coverage reports that raising stamp prices from 78 cents to 95 cents "would largely solve our controllable loss," supporting Steiner's proposal.
Right: Republican Chairman Pete Sessions said he would work with USPS to address concerns but said he does not support raising stamp prices. "We're going to have to make tough decisions."
Service reduction vs. revenue increase trade-offs
Left: The left emphasizes protecting universal service and avoiding cuts to mail delivery days or rural post offices, viewing these as essential public infrastructure that must be maintained.
Right: Republicans question whether the mail agency has done all it can to cut costs on its own, implying service reductions or workforce adjustments may be legitimate cost-control options before seeking more taxpayer support.